AESNI is not hooked yet to the IPsec stack.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> It might be hypervisor's problem because they use KVM, but here are
> some information I have:
>
> DO smallest instance.
>
> > uname -a
> FreeBSD megashadow2 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #
Hi ,
As we all know, OpenSSL community moved away from the kernel implementation
to a user-space one not so long ago. Now trying to port the latest OpenSSL
code into FreeBSD kernel is one of the items i was looking at and after
having exhaustive rounds of discussion with relavent stake-holders, we
On 7/1/15 10:31 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Oliver Humpage
wrote:
Hello,
I hope this is a good list to post this on, I have a feeling the solution
is somewhere obscure in the networking layer.
I've set up an IPS system, using:
* FreeBSD 10.1 (guest OS, plenty of R
It might be hypervisor's problem because they use KVM, but here are
some information I have:
DO smallest instance.
> uname -a
FreeBSD megashadow2 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #3
r284996: Wed Jul 1 17:58:13 UTC 2015
freebsd@megashadow2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DOIPSEC amd64
cryptotest w/
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:17 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:40:46PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:29 PM, <[1]kpn...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > I just got a /56 block of ipv6 addresses today and I'm trying to
> > figure
> > out how to use it.
>
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174
--- Comment #22 from david.kel...@litchis.fr ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #21)
Sure, I'running now a releng 10.1 kernel with dev/e1000/ from r28.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200210
--- Comment #2 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kp
Date: Wed Jul 1 21:21:15 UTC 2015
New revision: 285016
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285016
Log:
MFC r284348: Fix panic when addin
Done in r285016.
Regards,
Kristof
> On 01 Jul 2015, at 18:11, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
>
> Hi Kristof,
>
> Thanks for fixing this! Could you MFC the fix?
>
> On 06/13/15 22:39, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200210
>>
>> --- Comment #
Created https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2970 to get faster closure on this
issue.
Cheers,
Hiren
ps: To comment, you need to sign up for an account. :-( I am not a fan
of the whole thing but people seem to respond faster on
reviews.freebsd.org so I went with it.
pgpYf6BdgHz3N.pgp
Description: PGP
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175864
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sbr...@freebsd.org,
Hi Kristof,
Thanks for fixing this! Could you MFC the fix?
On 06/13/15 22:39, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200210
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: kp
Date: Sat Jun 13 19:39:22 UTC 201
On 1 Jul 2015, at 15:31, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> For the latter two, you might be better off using netmap
> on vmxnet3 (in emulated mode, also disabling offloads),
> and if i remember well a couple of years ago there were
> efforts to use suricata on top of netmap.
> Worst case, you can just use t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170267
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |e...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150249
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |e...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2 from
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Oliver Humpage
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I hope this is a good list to post this on, I have a feeling the solution
> is somewhere obscure in the networking layer.
>
> I've set up an IPS system, using:
>
> * FreeBSD 10.1 (guest OS, plenty of RAM/CPU)
> * ESXi 5.5 (host
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=162153
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|In Progress
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174
Sean Bruno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
--- Comment #21 from Sean
Gary Palmer gpalmer at freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:42:43AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I vaguely remember being able to do this some years ago but I can't
> remember the details.
I believe they do, yes. In fact I seem to remember a discussion on
this in the last year and
Hello,
I hope this is a good list to post this on, I have a feeling the solution is
somewhere obscure in the networking layer.
I've set up an IPS system, using:
* FreeBSD 10.1 (guest OS, plenty of RAM/CPU)
* ESXi 5.5 (host OS, using Intel X520 10Gb cards. Not overloaded, all graphs
show it's
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:42:43AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 7/1/15 6:56 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If we don't support this as part of the interface renaming stuff, it
> > would certainly be good to.
> >
> >
> > a-
> >
> >
> > On 29 June 2015 at 21:36, Wei Hu wrote:
> >>> --
On 01/07/2015 06:40, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:29 PM, wrote:
>
>> I just got a /56 block of ipv6 addresses today and I'm trying to figure
>> out how to use it.
>>
>> Before I go rebooting my server I wanted to ask if the information in the
>> handbook "https://www.freebsd.o
On 01/07/2015 05:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 7/1/15 6:56 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If we don't support this as part of the interface renaming stuff, it
>> would certainly be good to.
>>
>>
>> a-
>>
>>
>> On 29 June 2015 at 21:36, Wei Hu wrote:
-Original Message-
Fr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174
--- Comment #20 from david.kel...@litchis.fr ---
(In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #19)
10.1-RELEASE-p10
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-n
23 matches
Mail list logo
