To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200323
Oliver Pinter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable10+
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200323
--- Comment #17 from Franco Fichtner ---
Ah, wasn't picked up by "PR:" in commit message, I see. My bad. Close this
ticket then? :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200323
--- Comment #16 from Oliver Pinter ---
This is already done in 10-STABLE:
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/5d11dcc72032e3027520c3aa2ffb5905115760e7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Hello!
Its receive only mode.
On Sunday, June 28, 2015, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 01:18:44PM +0300, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> > Hello, folks!
> >
> > I'm looking for solution which could do wire speed (56 mpps with
> > 64byte packets) for 40GE.
> >
> > We have tested PF_RING
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 01:18:44PM +0300, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> Hello, folks!
>
> I'm looking for solution which could do wire speed (56 mpps with
> 64byte packets) for 40GE.
>
> We have tested PF_RING/DPDK on Linux and could not achieve more than
> ~42 mpps and it's not enough for us.
Is this
Hello, Adrian!
How much mpps have you achieved with T5?
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've hit 40mpps TX/RX on the chelsio T5 hardware, but only on one
> queue. It's around 30-36mpps when RXing across multiple queues (for
> work distribution.)
>
> Yes, I keep bei
Hi,
I've hit 40mpps TX/RX on the chelsio T5 hardware, but only on one
queue. It's around 30-36mpps when RXing across multiple queues (for
work distribution.)
Yes, I keep being told the intel NIC will do higher full-duplex pps.
I'll try it out at some point.
-adrian
Hi.
Is it possible to configure VLAN priority on FreeBSD10-STABLE or
FreeBSD11-CURRENT?
Thanks.
Alex Liptsin
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ne
On Sunday, June 28, 2015, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
> Hello, Luigi!
>
> Thank you for detailed answer! Well, this issue related to NIC
> itself not so good to hear this. Thus, Intel / Chelsio is out of
> the game :(
>
>
Well before throwing them out kewp in mind that from my (albeit limited)
expe
Hello, Luigi!
Thank you for detailed answer! Well, this issue related to NIC
itself not so good to hear this. Thus, Intel / Chelsio is out of
the game :(
I just found Mellanox NIC's ConnectX 4 Lx which offer 75 mpps for 50
GE in data sheet:
http://www.mellanox.com/related-docs/prod_adapter_ca
Those 42mpps are probably close to the best you can get, take or leave a
few MPPs. I do not know of any pcie nic that can do 40g at 64byte frames.
On freebsd, Chelsio with netmap is in the 40-45mpps range too, and from
what I can tell those are HW limited, not CPU bound numbers. I40e with
netmap is
Hello, folks!
I'm looking for solution which could do wire speed (56 mpps with
64byte packets) for 40GE.
We have tested PF_RING/DPDK on Linux and could not achieve more than
~42 mpps and it's not enough for us.
Could anybody share experience regarding performance estimations with
netmap and this
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200323
--- Comment #15 from Franco Fichtner ---
MFC still pending. Having this in 10.2 would be awesome. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@fr
14 matches
Mail list logo
