Re: em(4): difference between missed_packets and rx_overrun

2015-03-27 Thread hiren panchasara
+ jfv, erj from Intel. On 03/26/15 at 01:08P, hiren panchasara wrote: > This is what we are seeing on em(4) 82574L chipset running stable/10: > > dev.em.0.mac_stats.missed_packets: 1441927 > dev.em.0.interrupts.rx_overrun: 153 > > From the datasheet: > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ethe

Re: iwn(4) works (mostly) in stable/10; fails to associate in head

2015-03-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, That's the firmware getting in a tizzle, because a second wpa_supplicant came along and started the interface up before deciding one was running and quitting. If you built it as a module you can kldunload if_iwn ; kldload if_iwn. Or, just run it manually. -adrian

Re: iwn(4) works (mostly) in stable/10; fails to associate in head

2015-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:02:37PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Ooooh. I think you're hitting the "multiple wpa_supplicant > processes are running at startup" bug. :( > ... During a bit of exploring this morning, I'm not seeing evidence that I recognize as corroborating that suggestion. For o