On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Sato Kentney wrote:
> hi,
> his ipfw2 is ok for test now.
> http://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/12/11/15220.html
> i meet some problem in testing so asking qesstion in drafonflybsd's email
> list.
> and i want to know is it correct that the ipfw2 is faster than ipf
hi,
his ipfw2 is ok for test now.
http://www.dragonflydigest.com/2014/12/11/15220.html
i meet some problem in testing so asking qesstion in drafonflybsd's email
list.
and i want to know is it correct that the ipfw2 is faster than ipfw in
freebsd? it is what he said.
sure i will test it by myself.
t
So, I think I’ve identified the issue. In sys/net/ieee8023ad_lacp.c,
lacp_pdu_input() has a sanity check :
if (m->m_pkthdr.len != sizeof(*du)) {
goto bad;
}
I added some debugging information in if_lagg, and ran with it. The lacpdu
packet that being sent by th
zec added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:3804 Perhaps SI_ORDER_MIDDLE could work here
instead of (SI_ORDER_ANY - 255)?
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1309
To: rodrigc, bz, glebius, np, melifaro, hrs, wollman, bryanv, rpaulo, adrian,
gnn, hiren, rwa
rodrigc added a reviewer: zec.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1313
To: rodrigc, bz, glebius, trociny, np, melifaro, hrs, wollman, bryanv, rpaulo,
adrian, gnn, hiren, rwatson, zec
Cc: freebsd-virtualization, freebsd-pf, freebsd-net
___
f
rodrigc added reviewers: zec, network.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1312
To: rodrigc, bz, glebius, trociny, zec, np, melifaro, hrs, wollman, bryanv,
rpaulo, adrian, gnn, hiren, rwatson
Cc: freebsd-pf, freebsd-virtualization, freebsd-net
_
rodrigc added a reviewer: zec.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1309
To: rodrigc, bz, glebius, np, melifaro, hrs, wollman, bryanv, rpaulo, adrian,
gnn, hiren, rwatson, trociny, zec
Cc: freebsd-virtualization, freebsd-pf, freebsd-net
___
f
rodrigc added a reviewer: zec.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1315
To: rodrigc, bz, glebius, trociny, np, melifaro, hrs, wollman, bryanv, rpaulo,
adrian, gnn, hiren, rwatson, zec
Cc: zec, freebsd-virtualization, freebsd-pf, freebsd-net
At 11:02 AM 12/13/2014, eks...@freebsdbrasil.com.br wrote:
As I understand the problem, there are many ways to do this
without actually using any special feature on dummynet. From
tagging a traffic twice and feeding both tagged flows to the same
pipe, to the easiest and possibily lighter appro
zec added a subscriber: zec.
INLINE COMMENTS
sys/netpfil/pf/pf.c:1384 *v could be marked as __unused
sys/netpfil/pf/pf_ioctl.c:282 Passing curvnet as an argument here is
redundant now.
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1315
To: rodrigc, bz, glebius, trociny, np, melifaro, hrs,
rodrigc created this revision.
rodrigc added reviewers: bz, glebius, trociny, network.
rodrigc added subscribers: freebsd-net, freebsd-pf, freebsd-virtualization.
REVISION SUMMARY
Instead of creating a purge thread for every vnet, create
a single purge thread and clean up all vnets from this t
11 matches
Mail list logo