On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:44:43PM -0200, Evandro Nunes wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> >> i gues I am missing a piece of the architecture...
> >>
> >
> > ???probably yes :)
> >
> > kipfw em1 em2 connects the two interfaces to each other, keeping the
> > rest ???
Hi!
I got my hands on an GPON G.984.2 ClassB SFP and want to find a way
to operate it using FreeBSD.
What type of NIC with SFP slots can be recommended for this
exotic use case ?
It's data sheet:
http://www.allnet.de/fileadmin/transfer/products/113608.pdf
It's asymmetric with these specs:
1
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Michal Buchtík wrote:
> Dne 4.11.2014 20:44, Evandro Nunes napsal(a):
>
>> # ifconfig "em2" | grep flags
>> em2: flags=28d02
>> metric 0 mtu 1500
>>
> Hi,
> interface is OACTIVE and down.
>
> Do you try "ifconfig em2 up" ?
>
hey Michal,
strange, both NICs are ad
Dne 4.11.2014 20:44, Evandro Nunes napsal(a):
# ifconfig "em2" | grep flags
em2: flags=28d02
metric 0 mtu 1500
Hi,
interface is OACTIVE and down.
Do you try "ifconfig em2 up" ?
Michal
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Evandro Nunes
> wrote:
>
>> so, running em1 and em2 only should work?
>>
>> because I have the same behavior:
>>
>> # ps wauxw | grep kipfw
>> root 61484 0.0 0.0 14648 1824 2 S 5:06PM
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Evandro Nunes
wrote:
> so, running em1 and em2 only should work?
>
> because I have the same behavior:
>
> # ps wauxw | grep kipfw
> root 61484 0.0 0.0 14648 1824 2 S 5:06PM 0:02.95
> ./kipfw em1 em2
> root 61518 0.0 0.0 18804
so, running em1 and em2 only should work?
because I have the same behavior:
# ps wauxw | grep kipfw
root 61484 0.0 0.0 14648 1824 2 S 5:06PM 0:02.95
./kipfw em1 em2
root 61518 0.0 0.0 18804 1864 2 S+5:07PM 0:00.00
grep kipfw
# /usr/src/tools/too
the user space netmap-ipfw only supports two interfaces,
The hard problem in moving to 3+ interfaces is not much the code but
deciding where to send a packet once it has passed the filter.
Basically, passing things through the kernel stack is simple
but performance is going to be no better than
btw,
I am generating traffic via pkt-gen which I can see os received on the
other side:
# /usr/src/tools/tools/netmap/netmap-7e9e5e7602f5/examples/pkt-gen -i em1
-f tx -l 60 -d 172.16.250.10
643.417060 main [1649] interface is em1
643.417344 extract_ip_range [287] range is 10.0.0.1:0 to 10.0.0.1:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190102
Mark Felder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved
Resolution|--
hello,
I am trying to do some basic stateless filtering with netmap-ipfw.
what i have running is:
./kipfw em1 em2 lo0
and when i do ipfw/ipfw show:
ipfw/ipfw show
connected to 127.0.0.1:
nalloc 2248 nbytes 136 ptr 0x0
00100 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0
65535 0 0 allow ip from any to
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136911
rozhuk...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Discussion |Issue Resolved
Resolu
12 matches
Mail list logo