Dear freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org,
the "Needs MFC" status is subject to be removed in a few weeks and
will be replaced by the newly added flags "mfc-stable8", "mfc-stable9"
and "mfc-stable10".
We would like you to convert the bugs with the status "Needs MFC", that
are currently assigned to you, to tho
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453
--- Comment #3 from b...@boba.name ---
How can we be sure this change to "unsigned" type does not brake anything else
? There might be some other places in dummynet code where this variable may be
used as "signed". Unfortunately my C skills
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Eric Joyner wrote:
> So, what are the two fields on the media line for?
>
> AFAICT, it looks like the first field is the media the user wants to use
> (so the driver typically sets it to Ethernet autoselect by default?), and
> the
> second field is for the media th
So, what are the two fields on the media line for?
AFAICT, it looks like the first field is the media the user wants to use
(so the driver typically sets it to Ethernet autoselect by default?), and
the
second field is for the media that's active in the interface.
---
- Eric Joyner
I am not aware of any work but adding -net to get more "networking" eyeballs.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, October 20, 2014 a las 09:25:28AM +0200, Matthias Apitz
> escribió:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there any work started or in progress to implement TCP
On 10/20/2014 3:50 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 21.10.2014 00:00, Matthew Grooms wrote:
On 10/20/2014 2:47 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 20.10.2014 20:18, Matthew Grooms wrote:
Lastly, I tried to locate a relevant PR but didn't find anything
concrete. Is this related to the issue? And if
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Triage|In Discussion
C
On 21.10.2014 00:00, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 2:47 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
>> On 20.10.2014 20:18, Matthew Grooms wrote:
>>> Lastly, I tried to locate a relevant PR but didn't find anything
>>> concrete. Is this related to the issue? And if so, can it be MFCd?
>>>
>>> https://bugs
On 10/20/2014 2:44 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 11:18, Matthew Grooms wrote:
All,
There appears to be an issue with FreeBSD 10.x when using enc device to
filter inbound traffic on the receive path. After searching the mailing
lists, I see two different people reporting the i
On 10/20/2014 2:47 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 20.10.2014 20:18, Matthew Grooms wrote:
Lastly, I tried to locate a relevant PR but didn't find anything
concrete. Is this related to the issue? And if so, can it be MFCd?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110959
Did you try t
On 20.10.2014 20:18, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> Lastly, I tried to locate a relevant PR but didn't find anything
> concrete. Is this related to the issue? And if so, can it be MFCd?
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110959
Did you try the patch from last PR? It is small and shoul
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 11:18, Matthew Grooms wrote:
> All,
>
> There appears to be an issue with FreeBSD 10.x when using enc device to
> filter inbound traffic on the receive path. After searching the mailing
> lists, I see two different people reporting the issue ...
>
Your subject mentio
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194344
--- Comment #3 from Warren Block ---
Testing again with no changes, WoL worked. It seems intermittent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314
--- Comment #12 from Eric Joyner ---
(In reply to Garrett Cooper from comment #10)
> (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #8)
> > So it sounds like we may just need to change IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN from a fixed
> > value of 160 to something tha
All,
There appears to be an issue with FreeBSD 10.x when using enc device to
filter inbound traffic on the receive path. After searching the mailing
lists, I see two different people reporting the issue ...
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2014-January/076900.html
https://l
very cool!
cheers
luigi
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Jim Harris wrote:
> Just wanted to send a heads-up that Intel's Data Plane Development Kit
> (DPDK) for high speed packet processing was added to the FreeBSD ports
> collection last week under net/dpdk. Intel added support for FreeBSD
>
Just wanted to send a heads-up that Intel's Data Plane Development Kit
(DPDK) for high speed packet processing was added to the FreeBSD ports
collection last week under net/dpdk. Intel added support for FreeBSD
earlier this year, but until now required downloading from Intel's website
or dpdk.org.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194238
Alexander V. Chernikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||melif...@freebsd.org
---
Hi,
You have a bug in the "Needs MFC" state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again
19 matches
Mail list logo
