Thanks! This has tons more info. I'll have a read.
---
Sent from my phone, sorry about the typos.
> On 17 Oct 2014, at 18:27, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Matthew P. Grosvenor
>> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I’m trying to understand how to use the netmap fr
Hm, is this the bug that was just fixed in -HEAD?
I saw this similar bug on -HEAD with lots of quick connections and
reused ports. It ended up deferencing a NULL tcp timer pointer from
the inpcb. Is that what the code in your tree is doing?
-a
On 17 October 2014 23:32, Jason Wolfe wrote:
> On
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:23 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>
> I looked at the other trace and I don't think it disagrees with my previous
> theory. I do have more KTR patches to log when we spin on locks which would
> really confirm this, but I haven't tested those fully on HEAD yet.
>
> However, I
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:23 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>
> I looked at the other trace and I don't think it disagrees with my previous
> theory. I do have more KTR patches to log when we spin on locks which would
> really confirm this, but I haven't tested those fully on HEAD yet.
>
> However, I
prabhakar lakhera wrote
in :
pr> This probably is more of a compliance issue (or may be not as the NS
pr> receipt section of RFC 4861 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861#page-62 does
pr> not talk about it).
pr>
pr> The neighbor solicitation message format says this:
pr>
pr> http://tools.ietf.org
Sure! Put together a patch and let's review it.
-a
On 17 October 2014 17:02, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to enquire about the possibility of adding an IP_PEERCRED
> socket option to ip(4) which would be similar to LOCAL_PEERCRED for
> unix(4).
>
> Such a option, when
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314
--- Comment #11 from Garrett Cooper ---
(In reply to Garrett Cooper from comment #10)
...
> - What architectures is this driver supported on?
What I was really driving at with this question is "What architectures does
Intel support this dr
Hello,
I would like to enquire about the possibility of adding an IP_PEERCRED
socket option to ip(4) which would be similar to LOCAL_PEERCRED for
unix(4).
Such a option, when requested via getsockopt(2) on a not-connectionless IP (v4
or v6) socket, would either
- return credentials of the remote
Urm ... question: is NS how, then, a client should be getting an IP over
PPP? I have an l2tp server configured with mpd ... and I've noticed that
mpd will allow me to turn on ipv6, but it won't assign addresses like ipv4.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:28 PM, prabhakar lakhera <
prabhakar.lakh...@gmai
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189404
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|amd64 |kern
Assignee|freebsd-am.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314
--- Comment #10 from Garrett Cooper ---
(In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #8)
> So it sounds like we may just need to change IXGBE_RX_COPY_LEN from a fixed
> value of 160 to something that's calculated based on the length of struct
> m_
On 10/17/14, 7:51 PM, Marko Zec wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:37:37 +0200
Marius Strobl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:27:28PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
It was for a while in 9.2, but we removed it from 10.0 and later
due to stabili
This probably is more of a compliance issue (or may be not as the NS
receipt section of RFC 4861 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861#page-62 does
not talk about it).
The neighbor solicitation message format says this:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861#page-22
Destination Address
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Matthew P. Grosvenor <
matthew.grosve...@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I’m trying to understand how to use the netmap framework, specifically how
> the head, tail and current “pointers” interact with each other.
>
> Looking in man NETMAP(4) (
> http://www.freebs
Hi all,
I’m trying to understand how to use the netmap framework, specifically how the
head, tail and current “pointers” interact with each other.
Looking in man NETMAP(4)
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=netmap&sektion=4) under data
structures, struct netmap_ring it says: " contai
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 13:37:37 +0200
Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:27:28PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > It was for a while in 9.2, but we removed it from 10.0 and later
> > > due to stability issues we kep
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:27:28PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
>
> >
> > It was for a while in 9.2, but we removed it from 10.0 and later due to
> > stability issues we kept getting reports about. Haven't tried it since
> > then, dont know if
17 matches
Mail list logo
