On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
wrote:
>
> I can use my forwarding/firewalling 10Giga lab for testing VIMAGE impact.
>
>
Thank you for doing the test and providing the results.
You put some good work into making those graphs and explaining the results!
--
Craig
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314
--- Comment #5 from Garrett Cooper ---
(In reply to Garrett Cooper from comment #4)
> `struct mbuf` as the observation hasn't been violated on FreeBSD CURRENT
"as the observation hasn't" -> "; the conditions for the optimization to work
ha
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194314
Garrett Cooper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|--- |Normal
--- Comment #4 from Garret
Hi all,
My home router is small FreeBSD 10 box, with 3 ethernet ports, I use pf
as a firewall.
My ISP provides FTTH, that ends at my home with a small box called CPE.
The CPE contains 4 ethernet ports. On one port I have Internet access,
on the other there is IPTV (that's based on udp/multic
Just wanted to say that with that patch it works on 10.1 with E2200.
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.07 GBytes 923 Mbits/sec
--
Andrey Cherkashin
Sent with Airmail
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:17 AM, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell <
johnandsa...@cox.net> wrote:
> do you mean VIMAGE allows a jail to use an iface device for many IPs or
> even MAC? i thought that was already the case all cards can "listen" -
> it's only a headers trick per say.
>
>
Search
Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
well the next step is to make it a dependancy so that free bsd won't
install without it, and to inject it in many binaries that insure
Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
Are there any tests results showing performance implications on different
network-related workloads?
Not everyone uses bhyve, so VIMAGE
On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> I can use my forwarding/firewalling 10Giga lab for testing VIMAGE impact.
> Here are my ministat results (smallest packet size, value in
> packet-per-second, about 2000 flows).
> => I didn't see lot's of performance impact with VIMAGE option adde
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Craig Rodrigues
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
> > Are there an
在 14-10-13 0:38, Bjoern A. Zeeb 写道:
On 12 Oct 2014, at 16:25 , Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
Hello,
it's been a while since I tested VIMAGE, but at the last time somewhere
in 10-CURRENT some UMA memory leaks were left when destroying vnets.
They weren't showstoppers for most workloads, but prett
11 matches
Mail list logo
