https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
--- Comment #13 from Dan ---
Thanks, btw. That worked.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
--- Comment #12 from Dan ---
(In reply to ncrogers from comment #11)
> (In reply to Dan from comment #10)
> > On 10.1-RC1, with the change below, I still get the dreaded "pfctl: igb1:
> > driver does not support altq". If ixgbe is targeted
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
--- Comment #11 from ncrog...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dan from comment #10)
> On 10.1-RC1, with the change below, I still get the dreaded "pfctl: igb1:
> driver does not support altq". If ixgbe is targeted for 10.1-RELEASE, can
> igb be
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053
Dan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan_...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #10 from Dan
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:36:49PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:24:13AM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Julien Cigar
On 03.10.2014 18:03, Vedant Mathur wrote:
> Andrey,
>
> Not a bad option. I saw you deleted the ip6_findaux routine which is
> used in route6_input. You have a ifdef around it. Whats that for?
Hi,
It isn't my ifdef, it was here and never has been used in FreeBSD.
Probably similar functional wil
Andrey,
Not a bad option. I saw you deleted the ip6_findaux routine which is used
in route6_input. You have a ifdef around it. Whats that for?
-Vedant
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov
wrote:
> On 30.09.2014 19:24, Vedant Mathur wrote:
> > *Solution 2:*
> >
> > In ip6_setdsti
On Thursday, October 02, 2014 06:40:21 PM Jason Wolfe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:24 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, September 08, 2014 03:34:02 PM Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> > > On 09/08/2014 15:19, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 12:09 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> > > >>
Hi,
On 23/05/14 14:06, Julien Charbon wrote:
> On 27/02/14 11:32, Julien Charbon wrote:
>> On 07/11/13 14:55, Julien Charbon wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:21:04 +0100, Julien Charbon
>>> wrote:
I have put technical and how-to-repeat details in below PR:
kern/183659: TCP stack
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 01:52:19PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
A> On 03.10.2014 04:40, Hariprasad S wrote:
A> > HI,
A> >
A> > Detaching the slave from the lagg interface which has vlan on top of it,
hits an panic.
A> > Kernel used: FreeBSD HEAD r272051
A> >
A> > Is anyone aware of this i
On 03.10.2014 04:40, Hariprasad S wrote:
HI,
Detaching the slave from the lagg interface which has vlan on top of it, hits
an panic.
Kernel used: FreeBSD HEAD r272051
Is anyone aware of this issue?
Yes. What is happening here:
We acquire lagg WLOCK to set new link layer address (due to "mast
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 12:40:30AM +, Hariprasad S wrote:
H> HI,
H>
H> Detaching the slave from the lagg interface which has vlan on top of it,
hits an panic.
H> Kernel used: FreeBSD HEAD r272051
H>
H> Is anyone aware of this issue?
Yes, melifaro@ demonstrated it recently. No fix available
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 04:36:49PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 10:24:13AM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
> >> > sorry for cross-posting, I'm forwarding th
13 matches
Mail list logo
