On 30.09.2014 19:24, Vedant Mathur wrote:
> *Solution 2:*
>
> In ip6_setdstifaddr() routine we can access the struct ifa using
> ia6->ia_ifa and retrieve the IP address from the ifa and then push it
> into the m_tag instead of the struct in6_ifaddr pointer. Then we will
> not require a refcnt incr
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Nils Beyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> >> Then I've connected a network cable and rebooted. I've got a link and
> >> performed an "iperf" test. The results are really good: around 930 Mbit/s
> >> TX and 840 Mbit/s RX. CPU load during that test
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185967
i...@gcecad-service.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@gcecad-service.nl
---
On 25 Sep 2014, at 9:15, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
Support tunable to control Tx deferred packet list limits
Also increase default for Tx queue get-list limit.
Too small limit results in TCP packets drops especiall when many
streams are running simultaneously.
Put list may be kept small enought s
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>>
Should work.
Please try the lates
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> Should work.
>>> Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Luigi
>>>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> Should work.
>> Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
>>
>> Cheers
>> Luigi
>>
>
> OK just cloned.
>
> What should tbe topology be like?
>
> igb(4) ->
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Should work.
> Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
>
> Cheers
> Luigi
>
OK just cloned.
What should tbe topology be like?
igb(4) -> netmap bridge -> vale -> ipfw?
will lagg0 -> netmap bridge -> ipfw work too?
Thank you for answering, I looked for functionality by myself, and found
none before asking. Drivers do it in different ways.
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 11:29 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, September 21, 2014 8:13:17 am clutton wrote:
> > Hi list. I'm relatively new here. So, Hi. :)
> >
> > I
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Marcelo Gondim
wrote:
> On 30/09/2014 13:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> Should work.
>> Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
>>
>> Cheers
>> Luigi
>>
>
> Hi Luigi,
>
> The netmap-ipfw be included in the FreeBSD 10.1 final?
>
no it is ou
On 30/09/2014 13:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Should work.
Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
Cheers
Luigi
Hi Luigi,
The netmap-ipfw be included in the FreeBSD 10.1 final?
Cheers,
Gondim
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
I have a problem, whe
Right now sopoll() always locks both socket buffers. The receive socket
buffer lock is always needed, but the send socket buffer lock is only needed
while polling for writing (there is a potential test of SBS_CANTSENDMORE
without the lock, but I think this might be ok). What do folks think?
I
Should work.
Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
Cheers
Luigi
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> I have a problem, where I need to fwd a high rate of pps, and I dont have
> enough CPU. It's around 900Kpps, so I would like to know if ipfw userlan
I have a problem, where I need to fwd a high rate of pps, and I dont have
enough CPU. It's around 900Kpps, so I would like to know if ipfw userland
version with netmap support will do fwd?
Here are my current rules:
00100 fwd 10.1.2.1 tag tcp from table(100) to any dst-port 80,1024-65535 in
{ via
On Sunday, September 21, 2014 8:13:17 am clutton wrote:
> Hi list. I'm relatively new here. So, Hi. :)
>
> I don't know how to read the real MAC, I mean the one which is burned in
> ROM. Is it possible from the user space? I've ported GNU macchanger and
> it's the last non ported feature.
>
> htt
On Monday, September 29, 2014 8:36:22 am Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we need to add private ioctl to the driver sfxge(4) to make FW update,
> do internal diagnostics commands etc.
> We see at least two approaches in other drivers:
> 1. SIOCGPRIVATE_0/ SIOCGPRIVATE_1 on net device
> 2.
Howdy,
I've attempted to gather all the Networking TODOs from our various,
scattered, wiki pages and concentrate
them all in one place. Please review
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Networking and if you need
update that page. That is now the central page for all our networking
todos and the like.
Hi all,
I am trying to address the refcount issues in the routine ip6_setdstifaddr
defined in the file ip6_input.c. The issue is described below:
The ip6_setdstifaddr routine is responsible for adding m_tags to an mbuf
and stashing the struct in6_ifaddr reference in the m_tag. Since the
in6_ifa
At first I'd thought it is the plain old broken multicast ethernet
support story, since I noticed it with an IPv6 only ARM system.
But multicast on all the system works fine, it is the neighbor solitictaion
request at fault selecting the wrong
My setup.
One client system, which failed to communica
On 9/30/2014 12:12 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 09/29/14 20:21, Ermal Luçi wrote:
Probably is better you ask this on freebsd-pf@.
Thanks, I see you have already cc:ed it.
Though this sounds like state limit reached.
Can this happen even if all my pf rules have "no state"?
No. Anyway,
Hi,
Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>> Then I've connected a network cable and rebooted. I've got a link and
>> performed an "iperf" test. The results are really good: around 930 Mbit/s
>> TX and 840 Mbit/s RX. CPU load during that test: "70.75% kernel{alc0
>> taskq}".
>
> Hmm, the RX performance number lo
Hi Lars,
for linux 3.16, can you try with "next" branch in
https://code.google.com/p/netmap/?
Thanks,
Stefano
2014-09-30 9:27 GMT+02:00 Eggert, Lars :
> On 2014-9-26, at 15:19, Leupoldt, Martin wrote:
> > has anyone experience about netmap on a Ubuntu 14.04 machine?
>
> I've compiled it with 3.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:20:31AM +0200, Nils Beyer wrote:
> Hi Yonghyeon,
>
> Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> > I've added support for QAC AR816x/AR817x ethernet controllers. It
> > passed my limited testing and I need more testers. You can find
> > patches from the following URLs. [...]
>
> My NIC (
Hi Yonghyeon,
Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> I've added support for QAC AR816x/AR817x ethernet controllers. It
> passed my limited testing and I need more testers. You can find
> patches from the following URLs. [...]
My NIC (System: "Dell Inc. Vostro 3460"):
--
On 2014-9-26, at 15:19, Leupoldt, Martin wrote:
> has anyone experience about netmap on a Ubuntu 14.04 machine?
I've compiled it with 3.13 under Debian; 3.16 fails to compile because the
patch doesn't apply cleanly.
Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
25 matches
Mail list logo
