Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer"

2014-08-26 Thread Jonathan Price
On 2014-08-27 01:40, Peter Wemm wrote: On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:40:27 free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: Hello, I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed that FreeBSD seems to be preferring IPv4, such as when establishing SSH connections. After reading through /

Re: 9.3 RELEASE not forwarding pkt-gen (netmap) packets over XenServer

2014-08-26 Thread Raimundo Santos
On 26 August 2014 20:16, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Raimundo Santos wrote: >> >> >> 15:38:13.286119 00:1b:21:53:51:3d > 00:1b:21:53:51:39, ethertype IPv4 >> (0x0800), length 60: (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto >> UDP (17), length 46, bad

Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer"

2014-08-26 Thread Peter Wemm
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 10:40:27 free...@jonathanprice.org wrote: > Hello, > > I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed that > FreeBSD seems to be preferring IPv4, such as when establishing SSH > connections. > > After reading through /etc/defaults/rc.conf, and la

Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer"

2014-08-26 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:40 AM, wrote: > Hello, > > I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed > that FreeBSD seems to be preferring IPv4, such as when establishing SSH > connections. > > After reading through /etc/defaults/rc.conf, and later > /etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl I

[Bug 193053] ixgbe(4) IXGBE_LEGACY_TX + ALTQ path broken

2014-08-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053 Hiren Panchasara changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You

Re: 9.3 RELEASE not forwarding pkt-gen (netmap) packets over XenServer

2014-08-26 Thread Olivier Cochard-Labbé
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Raimundo Santos wrote: > > 15:38:13.286119 00:1b:21:53:51:3d > 00:1b:21:53:51:39, ethertype IPv4 > (0x0800), length 60: (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto > UDP (17), length 46, bad cksum 6605 (->6604)!) > > 10.0.0.1.0 > 192.168.10.2.0: [bad

Re: ixgbe IXGBE_LEGACY_TX breaks build (patch/fix included)

2014-08-26 Thread Nick Rogers
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not surprised the legacy tx path has bitrotted there. > > Please file a bug with this - https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ - and > then just keep poking people until it's done. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19

Re: ixgbe IXGBE_LEGACY_TX breaks build (patch/fix included)

2014-08-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, I'm not surprised the legacy tx path has bitrotted there. Please file a bug with this - https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ - and then just keep poking people until it's done. Thank! -a On 26 August 2014 13:42, Nick Rogers wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to get the ixgbe driver + PF/ALTQ w

Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

2014-08-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 26 August 2014 14:22, Alan Somers wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mark Johnston wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:15:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >>> On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 11:05:12 am Alan Somers wrote: >>> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >>> > > O

Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

2014-08-26 Thread Alan Somers
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:15:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 11:05:12 am Alan Somers wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John Baldwin wrote: >> > > On Friday, August 22, 2014 01:34:28 PM Harald Schmal

ixgbe IXGBE_LEGACY_TX breaks build (patch/fix included)

2014-08-26 Thread Nick Rogers
Hello, I am trying to get the ixgbe driver + PF/ALTQ working under stable/9. Initially, loading a PF rulset with ALTQ enabled fails on an ix interface, reporting "ix0: driver does not support altq". This is similar to the behavior over the last few years when dealing with the igb driver. However,

New message from SoundCloud PR

2014-08-26 Thread SoundCloud
[letter.png] Hey, [1]SoundCloudPR sent you a message: The SoundCloud Promotional Service offers Artists, DJ's, Singers and Managers a simple, cost-effective way to reach targeted followers, sales, comments, plays and downloads on SoundCloud. We target

Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

2014-08-26 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:15:31PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 11:05:12 am Alan Somers wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Friday, August 22, 2014 01:34:28 PM Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > >> Bezüglich Yuri's Nachricht vom 02.09.2

Re: 9.3 RELEASE not forwarding pkt-gen (netmap) packets over XenServer

2014-08-26 Thread Raimundo Santos
That is what a tcpdump says (in vm0, the router): 15:38:13.286112 00:1b:21:53:51:3d > 00:1b:21:53:51:39, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 46) 10.0.0.1.0 > 192.168.10.1.0: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 18 15:38:13.286119 00:

Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

2014-08-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 11:05:12 am Alan Somers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Friday, August 22, 2014 01:34:28 PM Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > >> Bezüglich Yuri's Nachricht vom 02.09.2013 06:54 (localtime): > >> > Please check in this patch: > >> > http:

Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00

2014-08-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi! I'm going to merge Tom's work in a week unless someone gives me a really good reason not to. I think there's been enough work and discussion about it since the first post from Lars in Feburary and enough review opportunity. -a On 26 August 2014 07:55, Tom Jones wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2

9.3 RELEASE not forwarding pkt-gen (netmap) packets over XenServer

2014-08-26 Thread Raimundo Santos
Hello list, I am using FreeBSD 9.3 RELEASE over XenServer 6.2 with a quad port Intel NIC dedicated to my tests. I have three virtual machines, all using NICs with PCI passthrough, in this way: One VM (vm0) as router between the others, with two Intel NIC. Stock kernel. One VM (vm1) as generator

Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

2014-08-26 Thread Alan Somers
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, August 22, 2014 01:34:28 PM Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Bezüglich Yuri's Nachricht vom 02.09.2013 06:54 (localtime): >> > Please check in this patch: >> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181741 >> > Please MFC into 9.X

Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00

2014-08-26 Thread Tom Jones
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:43:49PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote: > Hi, > > the newcwv patch is probably stale now with Tom Jones' recent patch based on > a more up-to-date version of the Internet-Draft, but the PRR patch should > still be useful? My newcwv patch is much more up to date than Aris's,

Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00

2014-08-26 Thread Eggert, Lars
Hi, the newcwv patch is probably stale now with Tom Jones' recent patch based on a more up-to-date version of the Internet-Draft, but the PRR patch should still be useful? Lars On 2014-6-19, at 23:35, George Neville-Neil wrote: > On 4 Feb 2014, at 1:38, Eggert, Lars wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> b

[RFC] PLPMTU Blackhole Detection

2014-08-26 Thread Sean Bruno
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D506 This patch implements an attempt to adjust the MTU/MSS of a connection to work around poor networks that block ICMP fragmentation needed indications. sean p.s. I intend on working on a full PLPMTU implementation after working this into the tree.

[Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services

2014-08-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191975 Gleb Smirnoff changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gleb...@freebsd.org --- Comment #5

[Bug 192426] [bpf] [panic] [patch]: Kernel panic when using BPF

2014-08-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192426 Robert Clipsham changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[bpf] [panic]: Kernel panic |[bpf] [panic] [patch]:

Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer"

2014-08-26 Thread freebsd
Hello, I am configuring a server with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and have noticed that FreeBSD seems to be preferring IPv4, such as when establishing SSH connections. After reading through /etc/defaults/rc.conf, and later /etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl I have come to the conclusion that I have two ways to t