On 07/22/2014 04:38 PM, 神明達哉 wrote:
>
>>> usually subjective, and different people may have different opinions.
>>> Personally, I often find "ping6 -w" quite useful for debugging
>>> purposes, and I think limiting its use to link-local by default gives
>>
>> Agreed. Perhaps we should enable it onl
Hi,
Still a newbie here after more than ae decade off. This is most
likely a stupid question but I have invested an inordinate amount of
effort to figure it out with no success. That is, I have not resorted
to digging down into the source code to understand the error message.
I will do so if I a
On 27 July 2014 13:42, George Neville-Neil wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:30, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> hi!
>>
>> You can use 'pmcstat -S CPU_CLK_UNHALTED_CORE -O pmc.out' (then ctrl-C
>> it after say 5 seconds), which will log the data to pmc.out;
>> then 'pmcannotate -k /boot/kernel pmc.out /boot
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:30, Adrian Chadd wrote:
hi!
You can use 'pmcstat -S CPU_CLK_UNHALTED_CORE -O pmc.out' (then ctrl-C
it after say 5 seconds), which will log the data to pmc.out;
then 'pmcannotate -k /boot/kernel pmc.out /boot/kernel/kernel' to find
out where the most cpu cycles are being sp
On 6 Jul 2014, at 4:52, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Jul 5, 2014, at 20:04, "George Neville-Neil"
wrote:
Hi,
I've coded up a system to allow you to control multiple other systems
for use in testing.
https://github.com/gvnn3/conductor
It's BSD licensed, of course, and is only alpha quality bu
Howdy,
I am currently doing performance comparisons and related work on PF in
FreeBSD.
While I can certainly hand craft a bunch of rulesets that should be
equivalent on both
systems I'm putting out a call to those who might be willing to share
some real world
rulesets with me and the rest o
Mark Martinec just reported this problem a few days ago, and he found a
work-around. See the following:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014-July/039347.html
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of V
Yeah, there's something odd going on. You shouldn't see any of that
lock contention if flowtable is enabled. Thus I think there's
Oh wait, the fastfwd code doesn't know about flowtables. I just looked
at it (sys/netinet/ip_fastfwd.c.)
Try disabling fastfwd for a test and see if the lock profile i
On 07/27/2014 11:45 PM, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
> Say me, please, how I can transfer between servers ZFS-partitions larger than
> 20Gb.
> I have 4 partitions with backup data. There are a lot of small pictures.
>
> NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
> tank2
Say me, please, how I can transfer between servers ZFS-partitions larger than
20Gb.
I have 4 partitions with backup data. There are a lot of small pictures.
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
tank2 1,42T 1,32T 118M legacy
...
I shouldn't even be coming close to maxflows in this test scenario.
net.flowtable.enable: 1
net.flowtable.maxflows: 1042468
On 07/26/2014 10:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Flowtable is enabled? That's odd, it shouldn't be showing up like that.
>
>
>
> -a
>
>
>
_
On 07/27/14 07:40, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Someone just needs to go through and audit which place(s) the physical
interface (ath0, iwn0, etc) and the VAPs (wlan0, wlan1, etc) should
have their interface statistics updated.
I recall finding that this isn't consistently done by all NICs but
then
12 matches
Mail list logo
