Dear,
I'm having the following problem:
Host A (my network):
===
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=4219b
ether 00:1e:67:30:ea:27
inet 186.xxx.48.3 netmask 0xffe0 broadcast 186.xxx.48.31
inet6 fe80::21e:67ff:fe30:ea27%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x
I was looking at sys/net/if_lagg.c, and wanted to know the usage of
functions such as lagg_ioctl(), lagg_input() etc.
Regards,
Sridhar
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:05:00PM -0700, Sridhar Iyer wrote:
> > I didn't find the api examples
> >
> h
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:05:00PM -0700, Sridhar Iyer wrote:
> I didn't find the api examples
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=lagg&sektion=4&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.2-RELEASE+and+Ports
> This only shows the usage via cli.
>
See the rc.conf(5) manual.
Glen
pgpbozXGWKYNv.pgp
Des
Not sure what you mean by API examples?
The usual use of this would be to configure it at startup in
/etc/rc.conf
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Sridhar Iyer"
To: "Steven Hartland"
Cc: "freebsd-net"
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Using lagg
I d
I didn't find the api examples
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=lagg&sektion=4&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.2-RELEASE+and+Ports
This only shows the usage via cli.
Regards,
Sridhar
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> Have a look at the man page using:
> man lagg
>
Have a look at the man page using:
man lagg
It gives you all the details including examples.
Regards
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Sridhar Iyer"
Hi all,
I have been looking at apis in sys/net/if_lagg.c and usage in
ifconfig/iflagg.c. They both seem to be different. I'm
Hi all,
I have been looking at apis in sys/net/if_lagg.c and usage in
ifconfig/iflagg.c. They both seem to be different. I'm new to freebsd and I
need to use the apis to create a lagg of interfaces. What would be the best
way to get up to speed? Is there some example out there, which just creates
Yeah:
Adrians-MacBook-Pro:Downloads adrian$ head -2
debug.lock.prof.stats.out.20140725 ; cat
debug.lock.prof.stats.out.20140725 | sort -nk4 | tail -10
debug.lock.prof.stats:
max wait_max total wait_total countavg wait_avg
cnt_hold cnt_lock name
6 3
terested parties privately.
>
> pmcannotate summary output:
>
> grep ^Profile pmcannotate.20140725
> Profile trace for function: __rw_rlock() [17.04%]
> Profile trace for function: __mtx_unlock_flags() [9.10%]
> Profile trace for function: _rw_runlock_cookie() [7.67%]
> Pro
On 7/22/14, 11:18 PM, John Jasen wrote:
Feedback and/or tips and tricks more than welcome.
Outstanding questions:
Would increasing the number of processor cores help?
Would a system where both processor QPI ports connect to each other
mitigate QPI bottlenecks?
Are there further performance op
erested parties privately.
pmcannotate summary output:
grep ^Profile pmcannotate.20140725
Profile trace for function: __rw_rlock() [17.04%]
Profile trace for function: __mtx_unlock_flags() [9.10%]
Profile trace for function: _rw_runlock_cookie() [7.67%]
Profile trace for function: sched_idletd()
11 matches
Mail list logo