Johan Kooijman wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> A while ago I started the thread "9.2 ixgbe tx queue hang" on
> freebsd-net.
> A lot more people had the same as I had. Could anybody tell me if
> this
> issue is resolved in 9.3 RC? I haven't been able to find anything
> about it.
>
Well, it depends on your d
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:29:44PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Cool! Would you mind throwing it into a bugzilla ticket so it's not
> lost and it can be assigned for some review?
>
> http://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/
Done.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191520
> Is ther
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190038
Cy Schubert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
Assignee|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191343
Cy Schubert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@freebsd.org
Assignee|
Hi!
Cool! Would you mind throwing it into a bugzilla ticket so it's not
lost and it can be assigned for some review?
http://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/
Is there any benefit in hanging this state off of it as a pointer to
some other struct, rather than having it in the tcpcb? Is it always
going to b
Hello,
Attached is a patch which implements draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-06, "Updating TCP
to support Rate-Limited Traffic". The patch is a port of the Linux
implementation by Raffaello Secchi with influence from Aris
Angelogiannopoulos's patch set that was sent to the list earlier this year.
--
Tom
Hey all,
A while ago I started the thread "9.2 ixgbe tx queue hang" on freebsd-net.
A lot more people had the same as I had. Could anybody tell me if this
issue is resolved in 9.3 RC? I haven't been able to find anything about it.
--
Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
Johan Kooijman
_
Hi,
You have a bug in the "Needs MFC" state which has not been touched in 7 or more
days. This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or
marked it as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again