Larry Rosenman wrote
in <20140619140801.ga65...@thebighonker.lerctr.org>:
le> > le> Ideas? (I may be an idiot, so any criticism welcomed).
le> > le>
le> > le> if you need the 1841's config, I can supply that as well. It's using
a Hurricane
le> > le> electric Tunnel.
le> >
le> > How frequent
John Hay wrote
in <20140619103513.ga92...@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>:
jh> Hi Guys,
jh>
jh> freebsd-rc did not react, so I'm just checking on -net too.
jh>
jh> I found after upgrading that vlan handling broke. I tried the following:
jh>
jh> vlans_bce1="6"
jh> ipv4_addrs_bce1_6="inet 10.239.100.2/2
On 06/17/2014 18:48, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, hiren.
You wrote 17 июн� 2014 г., 11:41:35:
It looks like, that some TCP connections could benefit from LEDBAT
(RFC-6871) cognestion control algorithm (not all, of course, it should not
be default).
I wonder what you think of us
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 08:59:49AM +0800, 张晗 wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I am doing a research on D2TCP(http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2342388), I
> just want to implement it into the linux kernel. When calculating the penalty
> function, it is p = a^d, where 0< a < 1 and 0< d < 1. Since the kernel
wrote this message on Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:00 +0800:
> I am doing a research on D2TCP(http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2342388), I
> just want to implement it into the linux kernel. When calculating the penalty
> function, it is p = a^d, where 0< a < 1 and 0< d < 1. Since the kernel on
Hi:
I am doing a research on D2TCP(http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2342388), I
just want to implement it into the linux kernel. When calculating the penalty
function, it is p = a^d, where 0< a < 1 and 0< d < 1. Since the kernel only
offers integer, so in my code, so I let a multiply 2^1
Hi:
I am doing a research on D2TCP(http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2342388), I
just want to implement it into the linux kernel. When calculating the penalty
function, it is p = a^d, where 0< a < 1 and 0< d < 1. Since the kernel only
offers integer, so in my code, so I let a multiply 2^1
On 4 Feb 2014, at 1:38, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> below are two patches that implement RFC6937 ("Proportional Rate Reduction
> for TCP") and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 ("Updating TCP to support
> Rate-Limited Traffic"). They were done by Aris Angelogiannopoulos for his MS
> thesis, which is
On 2014-Jun-19 20:40:48 +0800, 张晗 wrote:
>how can I implement, in an efficient, way the pow() function in kernel space ?
> Is there any function I can use o r how I can evaluate pow function in kernel
>model?
Since the kernel only offers integer arithmetic, one approach would be
square and mult
There is no floating point types in kernel, so there is no pow() in kernel.
On 6/19/14, 5:40 AM, wrote:
> how can I implement, in an efficient, way the pow() function in kernel space
> ? Is there any function I can use o r how I can evaluate pow function in
> kernel model?
>
> Thanks!
> On 19/06/14 05:11, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>
>>
>> FreeBSD doesn't support 6rd. Ironically, pfSense does.
>
> This is not entirely true. 6RD is about establishing a 6to4 tunnel to a
> well-defined tunnel server in your provider's infrastructure, so as long
> as you have the details about the tunn
> On 6/18/2014 10:12 PM, Chris H wrote:
>>> FreeBSD doesn't support 6rd. Ironically, pfSense does.
> >
>> Are you sure?
>> There are even a couple of 6rd ports:
>> net/stf-6rd-kmod
>> and
>> net/u6rd
>> or am I to understand that _without_ those ports, FreeBSD doesn't
>> support 6rd.
>
> Yes, if
how can I implement, in an efficient, way the pow() function in kernel space ?
Is there any function I can use o r how I can evaluate pow function in kernel
model?
Thanks!
--
??
--
HanZhang
School of Computer Science
Tsinghua University,
On 19/06/14 05:11, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>
> FreeBSD doesn't support 6rd. Ironically, pfSense does.
This is not entirely true. 6RD is about establishing a 6to4 tunnel to a
well-defined tunnel server in your provider's infrastructure, so as long
as you have the details about the tunnel server's
Hi Guys,
freebsd-rc did not react, so I'm just checking on -net too.
I found after upgrading that vlan handling broke. I tried the following:
vlans_bce1="6"
ipv4_addrs_bce1_6="inet 10.239.100.2/24"
ifconfig_bce1_6_aliases="inet 10.239.100.2/24"
ifconfig_bce1_6_alias0="inet 10.239.100.2/24"
I tr
Larry Rosenman wrote
in <20140612202349.ga65...@thebighonker.lerctr.org>:
le> I just started using IPv6 behind my (new to me) Cisco 1841.
le>
le> I see lots of:
le> Jun 12 15:16:25 thebighonker kernel: in6_ifadd:
2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a is already configured
le>
le> in my /var/log
On 6/18/2014 10:12 PM, Chris H wrote:
FreeBSD doesn't support 6rd. Ironically, pfSense does.
>
Are you sure?
There are even a couple of 6rd ports:
net/stf-6rd-kmod
and
net/u6rd
or am I to understand that _without_ those ports, FreeBSD doesn't
support 6rd.
Yes, if you bring in third-party cod
17 matches
Mail list logo
