Your original porpose of pps is good enough for me, it controls packets
number for each second. it is simple and make sence, As a network
administrator, I think if you provide "packets per second" or "packets per
minute" ,that is good enough for 99% percent of users.
Thanks,
Sato K(佐藤柯德)
On Fri
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154169
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172113
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168294
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=145600
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=139204
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137841
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137776
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127360
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs MFC |Issue Resolved
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 12:10:26AM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
> Sorry for waste you time to explain it again, I will read the code first.
>
> And the latest patch of `PPS` should be OK, I checked the logic carefully
> this time. I sent it out last weekend.
>
> logic as below, PPS actually will be fulf
Sorry for waste you time to explain it again, I will read the code first.
And the latest patch of `PPS` should be OK, I checked the logic carefully this
time. I sent it out last weekend.
logic as below, PPS actually will be fulfilled using `PPT`,(N packets per M
ticks).
+
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 10:49:27PM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
> Hi Luigi,
> Yes, use string instead of integer for the ID of table, but the same method
> cannot apply to the feature `set type of table`. And in the kernel, compare
> string will cause more than compare an integer. In my opinion, actuall
Hi Luigi,
Yes, use string instead of integer for the ID of table, but the same method
cannot apply to the feature `set type of table`. And in the kernel, compare
string will cause more than compare an integer. In my opinion, actually they
are just alias name for the object. Users already accept
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:01:19PM +0800, bycn82 wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Here is my patch, with this patch, the ipfw can support below commands,
>
> root@FB10Head:~ # ipfw table 1 name saleteam
> root@FB10Head:~ # ipfw table 1 name show
> saleteam
Bill,
as it was discussed previously, exposing th
Hi Alex,
Here is my patch, with this patch, the ipfw can support below commands,
root@FB10Head:~ # ipfw table 1 name saleteam
root@FB10Head:~ # ipfw table 1 name show
saleteam
root@FB10Head:~ # ipfw table saleteam add 1.2.3.4
root@FB10Head:~ # ipfw table saleteam list
1.2.3.4/32 0
root@FB10Head:
Hi,
You have a bug in the "Needs MFC" state which has not been touched in 7 days.
This email serves as a reminder that you may want to MFC this bug or marked it
as completed.
In the event you have a longer MFC timeout you may update this bug with a
comment and I won't remind you again for 7 da
16 matches
Mail list logo