Em 07/05/14 23:05, Alan Somers escreveu:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
Em 07/05/14 15:57, Marcelo Gondim escreveu:
Em 07/05/14 15:18, Alan Somers escreveu:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Marcelo Gondim
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having this problemon my FreeBSD 10-STABLE:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
> Em 07/05/14 15:57, Marcelo Gondim escreveu:
>
>> Em 07/05/14 15:18, Alan Somers escreveu:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Marcelo Gondim
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having this problemon my FreeBSD 10-STABLE:
Em 07/05/14 15:57, Marcelo Gondim escreveu:
Em 07/05/14 15:18, Alan Somers escreveu:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Marcelo Gondim
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having this problemon my FreeBSD 10-STABLE:
(root@rt01)[~]# arp -an|grep 187.xxx.216.252
? (187.xxx.216.252) at 5c:e0:f6:00:11:29 on vlan4 pe
Em 07/05/14 15:18, Alan Somers escreveu:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having this problemon my FreeBSD 10-STABLE:
(root@rt01)[~]# arp -an|grep 187.xxx.216.252
? (187.xxx.216.252) at 5c:e0:f6:00:11:29 on vlan4 permanent [vlan]
(root@rt01)[~]# arp -d 187.xx
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having this problemon my FreeBSD 10-STABLE:
>
> (root@rt01)[~]# arp -an|grep 187.xxx.216.252
> ? (187.xxx.216.252) at 5c:e0:f6:00:11:29 on vlan4 permanent [vlan]
>
> (root@rt01)[~]# arp -d 187.xxx.216.252
> delete: cannot loca
Hi all,
I'm having this problemon my FreeBSD 10-STABLE:
(root@rt01)[~]# arp -an|grep 187.xxx.216.252
? (187.xxx.216.252) at 5c:e0:f6:00:11:29 on vlan4 permanent [vlan]
(root@rt01)[~]# arp -d 187.xxx.216.252
delete: cannot locate 187.xxx.216.252
FreeBSD rt01.xx.com.br 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10
Sorry for my inaccuracy!
I use "./pkt-gen -i eth0 -f tx" in sender and "
./pkt-gen -i eth0 -f rx" in receiver.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Mahnaz Talebi wrote:
> I use this scenario for test netmap-based ipfw with real NICs.
>
>
> ===
I use this scenario for test netmap-based ipfw with real NICs.
=
sender (eth0:10.10.1.1)DUT (eth0:10.10.1.2)
(eth1:10.10.2.2)receiver(10.10.2.3:eth0)
./pkt-gen -i eth0 -f rx ->
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:07:09AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> On 07 May 2014, at 09:56, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:52:47AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> >> On 02 May 2014, at 16:02, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On 02 May 2014, at 10:22 , Michael Tuexe
On 07 May 2014, at 09:56, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:52:47AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> On 02 May 2014, at 16:02, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 02 May 2014, at 10:22 , Michael Tuexen
>>> wrote:
>>>
Dear all,
during testing I found that Free
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:52:47AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> On 02 May 2014, at 16:02, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> >
> > On 02 May 2014, at 10:22 , Michael Tuexen
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> during testing I found that FreeBSD head (on a raspberry pi) accepts SCTP
> >> packet
Hi,
I've a couple of boxes which *might* be hitting the ceiling for their NIC's
(i.e. using all the bandwidth on the link).
Other than looking at 'systat -if' - is there anything in netstat's output
(or anywhere else) that would indicate the system is either heavily queuing
outgoing packets
12 matches
Mail list logo