On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Raimundo Santos wrote:
> On 28 April 2014 01:58, Mahnaz Talebi wrote:
>
> > I am trying to run netmap-based ipfw with real NICs
>
>
> Hello,
>
> there are some drivers that does not support netmap yet.
>
​thanks for the answer but it wasn't that, i spoke to Mahn
On 28 April 2014 01:58, Mahnaz Talebi wrote:
> I am trying to run netmap-based ipfw with real NICs
Hello,
there are some drivers that does not support netmap yet.
Raimundo Santos
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On 4/28/14, 7:06 PM, Dominic Froud wrote:
On 28/04/2014 11:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
replying to myself..
On 4/28/14, 6:11 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/28/14, 5:44 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 04/28/14 11:18, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
You could put all the services which are on 2.0.0.2 i
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On 28/04/2014 11:15, Julian Elischer wrote:
replying to myself..
On 4/28/14, 6:11 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/28/14, 5:44 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 04/28/14 11:18, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
You could put all the services which are on 2.0.0.2 in a separate
fib and
there have another d
replying to myself..
On 4/28/14, 6:11 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/28/14, 5:44 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 04/28/14 11:18, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
You could put all the services which are on 2.0.0.2 in a separate
fib and
there have another default-route.
Thanks, but unfortunately I ca
On 4/28/14, 5:44 PM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 04/28/14 11:18, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
You could put all the services which are on 2.0.0.2 in a separate
fib and
there have another default-route.
Thanks, but unfortunately I can't, since some services must be able
to answer on both addresses.
On 04/28/14 11:16, Dominic Froud wrote:
You want source-based routing.
Thanks, that term will help me in my searches.
I have this situation and I used pf(4) to do it with a rule like:
pass out quick route-to ( vlan2 ) from 2.0.0.0/29 to any no state
As a variation you can give an optiona
On 04/28/14 11:18, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
You could put all the services which are on 2.0.0.2 in a separate fib and
there have another default-route.
Thanks, but unfortunately I can't, since some services must be able to
answer on both addresses.
Maybe I could use socket in one fib to proxy
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Dominic Froud wrote:
> On 28/04/2014 09:58, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
>
>> I've got a server which has two (or more) interfaces with public IPs.
>>
>> Let's say, as an example (with fictional IPs):
>> ifconfig_vlan1="inet 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.248..."
>> ifco
On 28/04/2014 09:58, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
I've got a server which has two (or more) interfaces with public IPs.
Let's say, as an example (with fictional IPs):
ifconfig_vlan1="inet 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.248..."
ifconfig_vlan2="inet 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.248..."
Of course, I can on
Hello.
This has probably come up several times, however...
I've got a server which has two (or more) interfaces with public IPs.
Let's say, as an example (with fictional IPs):
ifconfig_vlan1="inet 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.248..."
ifconfig_vlan2="inet 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.248..."
Of c
12 matches
Mail list logo