Christopher Forgeron wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I can report this problem as well on 10.0-RELEASE.
>
>
>
> I think it's the same as kern/183390?
>
>
>
> I have two physically identical machines, one running 9.2-STABLE, and
> one
> on 10.0-RELEASE.
>
>
>
> My 10.0 machine used to be running
Hey Christopher,
Can you paste the output of "uname -a" as a reply to this email? Thx!
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Christopher Forgeron
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm replying on the "9.2 ixgbe tx queue hang" thread, and wanted to tie in
> here the fact that I was able to replicate this problem
Hi,
I have noticed net graph has issues with device that have a period in their
name. Either that is the case or something similar.
I couldn’t enable netflow on lagg0.X devices and I also couldn’t use some of
mpd's features(such as LAC) either. I believe there were other examples but
those are
Hello,
I'm replying on the "9.2 ixgbe tx queue hang" thread, and wanted to tie in
here the fact that I was able to replicate this problem with iSCSI only, no
NFS.
I assume the conversation will continue on the other thread.
Johan Kooijman @ Sat Mar 1 08:55:14 UTC 2014
>
>I think NFS is part of
(Sorry for the formatting on that last message, that was weird)
Today I wanted to test the assertion that this is a NFS issue, since we all
seem to be running NFS.
I shut down my NFS daemon in rc.conf, configured the FreeBSD10 iSCSI ctld,
rebooted, and then ran all my tests exclusively from the
Hello,
I can report this problem as well on 10.0-RELEASE.
I think it's the same as kern/183390?
I have two physically identical machines, one running 9.2-STABLE, and one
on 10.0-RELEASE.
My 10.0 machine used to be running 9.0-STABLE for over a year without any
problems.
I'm not havin
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:05:23PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 3/18/14, 8:33 PM, George Neville-Neil wrote:
> >On Mar 7, 2014, at 1:23 , hiren panchasara
> >wrote:
> >
> >>I am thinking of committing following change that includes port number
> >>in "Listen queue overflow" messages.
> I th
thanks for the suggestions we'll integrate them
cheers
luigi
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Mark Delany wrote:
> (Luigi's page suggests posting here.)
>
> Very recent freebsd10 (r263256)
>
> 1) the manpage says "SEE TRANSPARENT MODE" but no such section
>exists.
>
> 2) the manpage refer
(Luigi's page suggests posting here.)
Very recent freebsd10 (r263256)
1) the manpage says "SEE TRANSPARENT MODE" but no such section
exists.
2) the manpage refers to NR_RING_NIC_SW when I think it means
NR_REG_NIC_SW.
3) No mention is made of access control. I think earlier documentation
Hi, list.
Guys, I think somebody have broken something in IPFW/network stack and in the
last stable revision I am unable to disable IPFW nor in base system nor in
jail. As workaround is adding permission rule.
In release-10 this problem is absent.
PR here http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.c
10 matches
Mail list logo
