On 3/14/2014 1:00 PM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote:
FYI -- after upgrade to 9-STABLE no further crashes occurred, even with IPv6
enabled.
What sort of uptime have you seen with ipv6 enabled ?
Now it's 19 days and still no crash occurred.
I would sometimes get a month on a box with ~ 500 users
>> FYI -- after upgrade to 9-STABLE no further crashes occurred, even with IPv6
>> enabled.
> What sort of uptime have you seen with ipv6 enabled ?
Now it's 19 days and still no crash occurred.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
... snip ...
> Ah. Well it was good to see the rules listed anyway, always helps.
>
> > Was the count rules something like:
> >
> > 1 901 46132 skipto 63000 ip from table(1) to any in recv
> > table(8)
> >
> > ... same as before ...
> >
> > 63500 895 45844 count log
Hi John,
On 07/03/14 13:43, Julien Charbon wrote:
On 06/03/14 22:57, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Julien Charbon wrote this message on Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:32 +0100:
[...]
Any thoughts on this particular behavior?
One thing that I noticed is that you now lock/unlock the tw and inp
lock a
l