Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Ian Smith
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 20:44:51 +0100, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > > > On 04.03.2014 09:58, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > > Why do I need the explict fwd rule? As far as I can see the ipfw man page > > > says nothing about skipto changing the

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 05.03.2014 23:44, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > With the above ruleset a packet > 1) triggering the first rule ( ie skipto no-op and the allow from any to > any ) is lost. > 2) triggering the second rule (ie skipto divert rule which returns it to > the stack ) is forwarded. So, I don't see in the co

C library network C libc attack consle incoming

2014-03-05 Thread Kenichi Mori
Konfusion server freebsd server demorated animation server is SGI but based Linux and AIX., tagments C library equal index.html.c Cyrillic dancers talk to mow mow <><><><><><><><><><><> halfing tone equationing tag in Courc symbol spacing really in def C., c hyperlink everyone memo write copymant

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 04.03.2014 09:58, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > Why do I need the explict fwd rule? As far as I can see the ipfw man page > > says nothing about skipto changing the packets, and since the 65533 rule > in > > the second ruleset triggers on

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 04.03.2014 09:58, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Why do I need the explict fwd rule? As far as I can see the ipfw man page > says nothing about skipto changing the packets, and since the 65533 rule in > the second ruleset triggers on the same thing as the skipto rule it would > seem like packets are "

Re: freebsd 10.0 not work carp protocol on Hyper-v

2014-03-05 Thread Maurizio Marini
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:48:09 + "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)" wrote: > Also if you don't mind, could you describe your problem once more to me? The > more detail the better. our test environment is following: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ovw0hv3cy4g2911/schema.pdf a video simulation of the issue is h

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Andreas Nilsson
Hello Raimundo On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Raimundo Santos wrote: > Hello, Andreas. > > If table(12) is empty, how will fwd know where to send the packets that > hits it? > My understanding is that the rule should not be triggered, as the "... from table(12)" will not match any packets. Othe

Re: freebsd 10.0 not work carp protocol on Hyper-v

2014-03-05 Thread Maurizio Marini
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 20:48:09 + "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)" wrote: Hi Abhishek > -virtualization list. > > Hi Maurizio, Could you tell us how did you get the drivers? Did you obtain > them as part of FreeBSD 10 or did you get them from our ports repo? your ports repo > > What version of FreeBSD

Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE

2014-03-05 Thread Raimundo Santos
Hello, Andreas. If table(12) is empty, how will fwd know where to send the packets that hits it? Best regards, Raimundo On 4 March 2014 02:58, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having a strange problem with ipfw and/or routing. I've only tested > this on 9.2-RELEASE-p3, amd64. The machi

Basic recipe/expectations for VALE w/physical ports

2014-03-05 Thread Nicholas Bastin
We're continuing to have problems with VALE not forwarding packets on physical ports, and I suspect at least some of the problem is local configuration - we've tried to cobble together the right workflow between fragments from various READMEs and the source code for the module and the tools, but wi