Old Synopsis: Remove dead code
New Synopsis: [netinet6] [patch] Remove dead code
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 9 03:34:41 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi
On 10/08/2013 13:19, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:05:18PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> E> > So true. :) Before I bothered, I just wanted to ask if a change was
> E> > impractical due to API commitments with several known out-of-tree
> E> > consumers. Hearing no such replie
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:05:18PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 09:46, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> > On 10/08/2013 09:15, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:49:11AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
...
> >> The easiest way to find consumers would be to build test the trivi
Eric,
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:05:18PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
E> > So true. :) Before I bothered, I just wanted to ask if a change was
E> > impractical due to API commitments with several known out-of-tree
E> > consumers. Hearing no such replies, I'll test a patch.
E>
E> I simply ren
On 10/08/2013 09:46, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 09:15, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:49:11AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>> E> The user-land definition of the Free() macro in sys/net/radix.h is
>> E> rather inconvenient. I work on a large C++ code-base, where sever
On 10/08/2013 09:15, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:49:11AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> E> The user-land definition of the Free() macro in sys/net/radix.h is
> E> rather inconvenient. I work on a large C++ code-base, where several
> E> classes define Free() functions. This h
Eric,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:49:11AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
E> The user-land definition of the Free() macro in sys/net/radix.h is
E> rather inconvenient. I work on a large C++ code-base, where several
E> classes define Free() functions. This header file gets indirectly
E> included in
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 16:57 -07:00, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Konstantin Kuzvesov < kuzve...@list.ru >
>wrote:
>>
>>I've got a FreeBSD file server running Samba, file upload speeds are okay,
>>but downloads are too slow.
>>First, I decided it is Samba's fault, but
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 16:57 -07:00, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Konstantin Kuzvesov < kuzve...@list.ru >
>wrote:
>>
>>I've got a FreeBSD file server running Samba, file upload speeds are okay,
>>but downloads are too slow.
>>First, I decided it is Samba's fault, but
