G'Day,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've ported the ip, tcp and udp DTrace providers to FreeBSD, following
> the Solaris documentation here:
>
> https://wikis.oracle.com/display/DTrace/ip+Provider
> https://wikis.oracle.com/display/DTrace/tcp+Provider
> htt
Hello!
I've ported the ip, tcp and udp DTrace providers to FreeBSD, following
the Solaris documentation here:
https://wikis.oracle.com/display/DTrace/ip+Provider
https://wikis.oracle.com/display/DTrace/tcp+Provider
https://wikis.oracle.com/display/DTrace/udp+Provider
My implementation of these p
You have a good point wrt VLANs on Windows but everyone uses Intel nics
right? :P
> -Original Message-
> From: Lev Serebryakov [mailto:l...@freebsd.org]
> Sent: 20 August 2013 23:07
> To: Joe Holden
> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: kern/181388: [route] Routes not updated o
Hello, Joe.
You wrote 20 августа 2013 г., 18:21:22:
>> JH> vlan interfaces achieve the same thing without having to mess about with
>> JH> mtus on routes and also give you an interface to work with, a much nicer
>> JH> method comparatively.
>> But it could put huge load on routing between these
The following reply was made to PR kern/181225; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service)
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/181225: commit references a PR
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:08:15 + (UTC)
Author: jhb
Date: Tue Aug 20 18:08:06 2013
New
(Apologies because of my poor english, it's not my first language.
Corrections are welcome. It's also my first post to this mailing-list)
I'm having some issues running a KVM-virtualized FreeBSD 9-STABLE
(somewhat 4 weeks old, so it has the latest netgraph code). I'm also
running a 7.4-RELEASE (al
On 20/08/2013 09:46, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Joe.
You wrote 20 августа 2013 г., 12:25:15:
JH> vlan interfaces achieve the same thing without having to mess about with
JH> mtus on routes and also give you an interface to work with, a much nicer
JH> method comparatively.
But it could put h
Hello, Joe.
You wrote 20 августа 2013 г., 12:25:15:
JH> vlan interfaces achieve the same thing without having to mess about with
JH> mtus on routes and also give you an interface to work with, a much nicer
JH> method comparatively.
But it could put huge load on routing between these two segments
On 20/08/2013 02:12, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Joe Holden wrote this message on Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:32 +0100:
Hm, I hadn't considered that... how do other OSes and vendors handle
this? (eg Linux?)
Just changing the connected route would probably suffice, or maybe if
any routes not added with
