The following reply was made to PR kern/180430; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: John Baldwin
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
me...@mellanox.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/180430: [ofed] [patch] Bad UDP checksum calc for fragmented
packets
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:13:44 -0400
Oops, my previous r
Georg Bege wrote
in <1374226382.2820.1.camel@atwork>:
th> Hello Hiroki
th>
th> Well I've got the subnet 2001:41d0:2:83a5::/64 and would like to route a
th> portion of this - let's say 2001:41d0:2:83a5:100::/124 via an gif
th> interface.
th> The ISP is OVH, I heard it's known for broken setups l
> Hello,
>
> Could any one comment about the use of the same MAC address in 2
> separate VLANs?
>
[...]
>
> Will this be an issue?
>
You might run into problems if the two (virtual) systems are attached to a
different port on your switch. Some switches don't take the vlan into
account when learnin
I think you maybe ok. Ive just looked at my esx config and the esx
management interfaces use their own generated macs, not the physical
interfaces ones. All the vms obviously use generated macs as well.
However I only looked over it at a superficial level.
Have you considered using a tap or spare
Hello Hiroki
Well I've got the subnet 2001:41d0:2:83a5::/64 and would like to route a
portion of this - let's say 2001:41d0:2:83a5:100::/124 via an gif
interface.
The ISP is OVH, I heard it's known for broken setups like bridging.
What kind of other information would you need?
Am Freitag, den 19.
Hello,
Could any one comment about the use of the same MAC address in 2
separate VLANs?
All my machines are connected to 2 VLANs (one public and one private)
with no routing in between the VLANs.
I used to run a FLEX license manager to a physical machine. When I
virtualized that service, I had t
