Re: kern/179901: commit references a PR

2013-07-04 Thread dfilter service
The following reply was made to PR kern/179901; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dfil...@freebsd.org (dfilter service) To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/179901: commit references a PR Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 18:38:19 + (UTC) Author: trociny Date: Thu Jul 4 18:38:00 2013

Re: snort does not block packets in inline mode in FreeBSD

2013-07-04 Thread Julian Elischer
On 7/4/13 7:16 PM, Nomad Esst wrote: Hi list I have the same problem as this http://seclists.org/snort/2012/q4/465 After talking to this guy, He said that they could not solve this problem and they have migrated to Suricata. Do have any ideas? Is this a bug? _

RE: kern/179999: [ofed] [patch] Bug assigning HCA from IB to ETH

2013-07-04 Thread Shahar Klein
The following reply was made to PR kern/17; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Shahar Klein To: John Baldwin , "bug-follo...@freebsd.org" Cc: Orit Moskovich , Oded Shanoon Subject: RE: kern/17: [ofed] [patch] Bug assigning HCA from IB to ETH Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 12:34:09 +

Re: kern/178612: [run] kernel panic due the problems with run driver

2013-07-04 Thread Sergey Maltsev
The following reply was made to PR kern/178612; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergey Maltsev To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, core.dumped...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/178612: [run] kernel panic due the problems with run driver Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:39:45 +0600 --047d7b3a8016f2661204

snort does not block packets in inline mode in FreeBSD

2013-07-04 Thread Nomad Esst
Hi list I have the same problem as this http://seclists.org/snort/2012/q4/465 After talking to this guy, He said that they could not solve this problem and they have migrated to Suricata. Do have any ideas? Is this a bug? ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mail

Re: Terrible ix performance

2013-07-04 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Lawrence Stewart>> On 07/04/13 10:18, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Steven Hartland >> >> Out of interest have you tried limiting the number of queues? >> >> If not give it a try see