I think I was misunderstood...
Here is the situation i want to handle:
My box is a router that handles several /24 behind.
One of my links (em0) is connected to a private network 192.168.0.1 is me,
my neighbour is 192.168.0.2.
I want to make that any connection comes to 192.168.0.1 to go to ip
193
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013, at 20:15, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:30:21 -0500,
> "Mark Felder" wrote:
>
> > Later after a bit more digging and discussion I've come to learn that the
>
> So, you've gone through the literature on this topic including
> http://tools.ietf.org/ht
At Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:30:21 -0500,
"Mark Felder" wrote:
> Later after a bit more digging and discussion I've come to learn that the
So, you've gone through the literature on this topic including
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01
?
> security aspect may simp
> Hi, (sorry for sending again, the last email was with wrong subject)
> I would like to perform a full dnat/snat as in iptbles in:
> linux-ip.net/html/nat-dnat.html
> How it can be done in fbsd, I use ipfw.
>
> I seeked natd man page but its translation, and thr proxy_rule is for
> specefic port,
After a brief talk on IRC I figured I'd get some feelers out there about
this sysctl which seems to have a long history.
Background: I recently updated the net/rwhoisd port here on FreeBSD with a
patch from the kind hrs@ who fixed it so it binds on both ipv4 AND ipv6
when it is built with i
Hi, (sorry for sending again, the last email was with wrong subject)
I would like to perform a full dnat/snat as in iptbles in:
linux-ip.net/html/nat-dnat.html
How it can be done in fbsd, I use ipfw.
I seeked natd man page but its translation, and thr proxy_rule is for
specefic port, not a whole t
The following reply was made to PR kern/179901; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Linimon
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/179901: [netinet] [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled
incorrectly
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:56:07 -0500
- Forwarded message from Bernd Walt
The following reply was made to PR kern/179901; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Linimon
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/179901: [netinet] [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled
incorrectly
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:55:38 -0500
- Forwarded message from Bernd Walt
Old Synopsis: Multicast loopback to own host broken
New Synopsis: [netinet6] [patch] Multicast loopback to own host broken
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jun 28 19:59:39 UTC 2013
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:15:14PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 03:59:24AM +, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > Old Synopsis: [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled incorrectly
> > New Synopsis: [netinet] [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled incorrectly
> >
> > Responsib
Hi,
I would like to perform a full dnat/snat as in iptbles in:
linux-ip.net/html/nat-dnat.html
How it can be done in fbsd, I use ipgw.
Thanks in advance,
Sami
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 12:37:13 am Mr. Clif wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for working on this. I'm very interested in getting this fixed
> for everyone that uses the Affected Atom boards and other small format
> boards that work well in small custom routers.
>
> However right now I have a b
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 03:59:24AM +, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Old Synopsis: [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled incorrectly
> New Synopsis: [netinet] [patch] Multicast SO_REUSEADDR handled incorrectly
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
> Responsible-Changed-By:
13 matches
Mail list logo
