I'm building a server to handle outbound NAT to the internet using FreeBSD 9.1
and its built-in distribution of pf. What I want to be able to do is NAT three
unique internal (private) VLANs to three unique public IPs. Our current setup
utilizes a single external IP address for all three internal
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:12:14 am YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:58:10PM -0700, Mr. Clif wrote:
> > Sorry for the confusion Pyun,
> >
> > I started looking at it in the context of pfsense, but they rejected my
> > bug report which was understandable because it's an upstream
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:29:46 am Alex Liptsin wrote:
> Hi John.
>
> I did it, but there is no ping between the vlans. Ping without VLANs on
that ports pass.
Unfortunately I do not have an IB setup to test this. I also don't know
how IB treats vlans (e.g. does it use an 802.1(q) type header
El día Thursday, May 30, 2013 a las 02:48:52PM +0300, Zeus Panchenko escribió:
> hi,
>
> may somebody help with the subject, please?
>
> is there way to bind tun device which ppp creates/uses to the definite
> one, let's say tun0 ? to avoid interface appointment change (in case I
> need binding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
may somebody help with the subject, please?
is there way to bind tun device which ppp creates/uses to the definite
one, let's say tun0 ? to avoid interface appointment change (in case I
need binding WAN on tunN)
for example OpenVPN allows to set
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Paul A. Procacci wrote:
> > The question:
> > Why can't you add a skipto to the default rule (65535)?
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2007-June/003067.html
>
> > I also consider using tablearg with divert, but manpage is contradicting
> > itself
> The question:
> Why can't you add a skipto to the default rule (65535)?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2007-June/003067.html
> I also consider using tablearg with divert, but manpage is contradicting
> itself in regards to divert with tablearg:
> " divert port
>
The following reply was made to PR kern/179083; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Linimon
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/179083: [netmap] [patch] Invalid index calucation in netmap
macro expansion
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 02:58:04 -0500
- Forwarded message from Lui
Synopsis: [netmap] [patch] Invalid index calucation in netmap macro expansion
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: linimon
State-Changed-When: Thu May 30 07:58:15 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why:
apparently the code is correct and the comments are wrong. The
comments will be fixed so
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 07:43:47AM +, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
> Old Synopsis: Invalid index calucation in netmap macro expansion
> New Synopsis: [netmap] [patch] Invalid index calucation in netmap macro
> expansion
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
> Responsible-Ch
Old Synopsis: Invalid index calucation in netmap macro expansion
New Synopsis: [netmap] [patch] Invalid index calucation in netmap macro
expansion
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu May 30 07:43:27 UTC 2013
Responsi
Hi John.
I did it, but there is no ping between the vlans. Ping without VLANs on that
ports pass.
Host1:
[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig ib0.100 create
[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig ib0.100 11.195.30.1/16 up
[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig
em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
Hello,
I started to test some more features of IPFW, namely skipto and fwd, both
in conjunction with tablearg.
The question:
Why can't you add a skipto to the default rule (65535)?
I also consider using tablearg with divert, but manpage is contradicting
itself in regards to divert with tablearg:
13 matches
Mail list logo
