Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3

2013-05-13 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 14.05.2013 08:08, Barney Cordoba wrote: > The defaults are broken. Finally we managed to get to the point. Hallelujah! ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "f

Re: High CPU interrupt load on intel I350T4 with igb on 8.3

2013-05-13 Thread Barney Cordoba
You have to admit there's a problem before you can fix it. If Eugene is going to blame to bottleneck and no one is going to tell him he's wrong, then there is no discussion. The solution in this case is to use 1 queue, which was my suggestion many days ago. The defaults are broken. The driver s

Request for Partnership

2013-05-13 Thread Hamidul Haque
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - My good friend, I am aware of the unsafe nature of the internet but due to the prevailing circumstances I don?t have any other option than to seek for partnership through this medium. Permit me, My Name is Mr Hamidul Haque, c

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2013-05-13 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

Re: kern/120304: [netgraph] [patch] netgraph source assumes 32-bit timeval on AMD64

2013-05-13 Thread Mitya
The following reply was made to PR kern/120304; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mitya To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, m...@engarde.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/120304: [netgraph] [patch] netgraph source assumes 32-bit timeval on AMD64 Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 11:01:20 +0300 This is a multi-part m