Re: LOR: "taskqueue_drain with the following non-sleepable locks held" with if_em

2013-05-07 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Xin Li wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 05/07/13 15:03, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> Saw the following LOR on a CURRENT build as of yesterday with an >> almost idle machine processing ARP requests: >> >> root@wf220:/mnt # taskqueue_drain

Re: VirtualBox + FreeBSD 9-STABLE == Frozen Ethernet

2013-05-07 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On 2013-05-06 2:49 PM, Norbert Beckmann wrote: To Marc G. Fournier I do not think it's an issue with VirtualBox. I am running VirtualBox under Solaris. And I never had problems with it. Guests: ubuntu, Windows 7, Linux Mint, FreeBSD, Chrome OS. But the people of VirtualBox themselves state that

Re: LOR: "taskqueue_drain with the following non-sleepable locks held" with if_em

2013-05-07 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/07/13 15:03, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Saw the following LOR on a CURRENT build as of yesterday with an > almost idle machine processing ARP requests: > > root@wf220:/mnt # taskqueue_drain with the following non-sleepable > locks held: exclusiv

LOR: "taskqueue_drain with the following non-sleepable locks held" with if_em

2013-05-07 Thread Garrett Cooper
Saw the following LOR on a CURRENT build as of yesterday with an almost idle machine processing ARP requests: root@wf220:/mnt # taskqueue_drain with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive rw lle (lle) r = 0 (0xfe001450b410) locked @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/in.c:1484 KDB: stack backt

Re: ppp(8) and inbound IP connections

2013-05-07 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 5/7/2013 3:24 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > That is my understanding as well, but why they claim that they do > support incoming connections? As Joe Holden said before, to support incoming connections, you probably need to use a different APN, or pay for that service. The carriers here in Can

Re: ppp(8) and inbound IP connections

2013-05-07 Thread Eric van Gyzen
On 05/07/2013 14:24, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 02:17:33PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen escribió: > >>> Ofc, the provider must NAT somehow my local addr behind some routable >>> valid IP addr, in our case 82.113.99.104; without this nothing would >>> come back, even when th

Re: ppp(8) and inbound IP connections

2013-05-07 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 02:17:33PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen escribió: > > Ofc, the provider must NAT somehow my local addr behind some routable > > valid IP addr, in our case 82.113.99.104; without this nothing would > > come back, even when the 1st SYN was from my side; the question is, w

Re: ppp(8) and inbound IP connections

2013-05-07 Thread Eric van Gyzen
On 05/07/2013 13:56, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 07:43:30PM +0100, Joe Holden escribió: > >>> tun6: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1500 >>> options=8 >>> inet 10.33.28.104 --> 10.64.64.64 netmask 0x >>> nd6 options=21 >>> Opened by PID 799 >>> >>

Re: ppp(8) and inbound IP connections

2013-05-07 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 07:43:30PM +0100, Joe Holden escribió: > > tun6: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=8 > > inet 10.33.28.104 --> 10.64.64.64 netmask 0x > > nd6 options=21 > > Opened by PID 799 > > > > and the routing is: > > > > > > Routing t

Re: ppp(8) and inbound IP connections

2013-05-07 Thread Joe Holden
Matthias Apitz wrote: Hello, I'm using ppp(8) for many years to connect via UMTS to my service provider and Internet, actually www.fonic.de; all this works fine already for long time, works fine for outgoing TCP and UDP connections to Internet. Until now, I did not care about incoming TCP conn

ppp(8) and inbound IP connections

2013-05-07 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, I'm using ppp(8) for many years to connect via UMTS to my service provider and Internet, actually www.fonic.de; all this works fine already for long time, works fine for outgoing TCP and UDP connections to Internet. Until now, I did not care about incoming TCP connections, for example fo

Re: Siftr inflight byte question

2013-05-07 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 06.05.2013 12:37, Lawrence Stewart wrote: [ccing freebsd-net@ so my problem description enters the collective subconscious in case I forget about this again] For everyone tuning in, Aris asked me the apt question of why siftr(4)'s "# inflight bytes" field doesn't take into account sacked byte

Re: Enabling netmap in fbsd9.1

2013-05-07 Thread C. L. Martinez
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > On Tue, 07 May 2013 00:45:15, C. L. Martinez wrote: > CLM> According to fbsd 9.1 release notes, netmap is included in this release, > CLM> but how do I need to do to enable this feature?. Do I need to recompile > CLM> default kernel with 'd

Re: Enabling netmap in fbsd9.1

2013-05-07 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
On Tue, 07 May 2013 00:45:15, C. L. Martinez wrote: CLM> According to fbsd 9.1 release notes, netmap is included in this release, CLM> but how do I need to do to enable this feature?. Do I need to recompile CLM> default kernel with 'device netmap' option enabled?. Only load kernel CLM> modules?. Y