On 4/20/2013 9:36 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
> I don't think so -- gre is not involved in the config.
>
> On 4/20/2013 7:59 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> - Original Message - From: "Karl Denninger"
>> ...
>>> My "ordinary" NAT entry is simply "nat 1 ip from any to any via em1",
>>> which wo
Be sure default gateway is properly cobfigured on the client not only the
tunnel
Sami
On Apr 21, 2013 6:42 AM, "Karl Denninger" wrote:
> I don't think so -- gre is not involved in the config.
>
> On 4/20/2013 7:59 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > - Original Message - From: "Karl Denninger"
I don't think so -- gre is not involved in the config.
On 4/20/2013 7:59 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Karl Denninger"
> ...
>> My "ordinary" NAT entry is simply "nat 1 ip from any to any via em1",
>> which works fine for ordinary "on the client" traffic; no pro
That does help. Is there a way for the kernel to access the memory map
directlyby segment name?
Laurie
--- On Thu, 4/18/13, John Baldwin wrote:
From: John Baldwin
Subject: Re: shm_map questions
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc: "Laurie Jennings"
Date: Thursday, April 18, 2013, 6:50 AM
On Thurs
- Original Message -
From: "Karl Denninger"
...
My "ordinary" NAT entry is simply "nat 1 ip from any to any via em1",
which works fine for ordinary "on the client" traffic; no problems with
that.
...
Just a stab in the dark, as I vaguely remember something similar, do you
also need to
Here's the situation.
I have a FreeBSD-Stable 9.1 system that has been running through the
various versions of FreeBSD for the last several years. It uses ipfw
and NAT to protect and serve PC clients along with other devices inside,
and has an outside connection as well. The topology looks like
On 4/19/13 5:54 PM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:22 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:11 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Hi all,
I have a strange problem with my FreeBSD 9.1 (fully patched): I loose
ssh sessions from time to time frequently.
This fbsd bo
