2013/04/13 16:01、Scott Long のメッセージ:
> Maybe something else, but whatever it is, it should be done. If you and Gleb
> don't want to do this, I will.
I already started writing a guide. See here for a very incomplete version:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rpaulo/ipf-deprecation/article.html
___
On Apr 13, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2013/04/13, at 5:03, Scott Long wrote:
>> You target audience for this isn't people who track CURRENT, it's people who
>> are on 7, 8, or 9 and looking to update to 10.x sometime in the future.
>
> Yes, I'm aware of that, but the problem re
On 2013/04/13, at 5:03, Scott Long wrote:
> You target audience for this isn't people who track CURRENT, it's people who
> are on 7, 8, or 9 and looking to update to 10.x sometime in the future.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but the problem remains. If ipfilter is broken or gets
broken because of the
Scott,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:31:09PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
S> One thing that FreeBSD is bad about (and this really applies to many open
source projects) when deprecating something is that the developer and release
engineering groups rarely provide adequate, if any, tools to help users
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Scott Long wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2013, at 12:33 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>> On 2013/04/12, at 22:31, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 12, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>>
On 2013/04/11, at 13:18, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Lack of maintainer in a n
On Apr 13, 2013, at 12:33 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2013/04/12, at 22:31, Scott Long wrote:
>
>> On Apr 12, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013/04/11, at 13:18, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>>>
Lack of maintainer in a near future would lead to bitrot due to changes
in other
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Sean Bruno wrote:
http://markmail.org/message/brpfcifnf2742pff
So, these never happened. *sigh*
I think they should. Any objections?
FreeBSD has too many knobs, but it would be nice if the bge defaults weren't
so broken, so that they don't need overriding.
Bruce
_
