My system is freebsd 8.2, openntp server prompts dispatch_imsg in main: pipe
closed error,Who can help me?Thanks!
-
FreeBSD http://www.unixnotes.net
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/openntp-server-prompts-dispatch-imsg-in-main-pipe-closed-error-tp57819
Hi Jack,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Neel Natu wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running into a problem in head with the e1000 link state
>> detection logic attached to a 82571EB serdes controller.
>>
>> The symptom is that the link state keeps
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 8:23:24 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> i found a couple of problems in
> dev/e1000/if_lem.c::lem_handle_rxtx() ,
> (compare with dev/e1000/if_em.c::em_handle_que() for better understanding):
>
> 1. in if_em.c::em_handle_que(), when em_rxeof() exceeds the
> rx_
> that was my case too. I have not gone too far into my investigation but
> should
> note that not _all_ interrupts were lost; my symptoms were queue overflows
> under netmap even at a low 2 Mpps, which with 2k entries in the rx ring
> means
> that the interrupt was delayed for more than 1ms, well
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Vijay Singh wrote:
> > just curious, is this happening under behyve or also native,
> > and is it always occurring or it is occasional ?
>
> Native, and it happens when the pps rate is high, even if the
> aggregate bandwidth is low.
>
>
that was my case too. I hav
On Monday, January 28, 2013 1:39:53 am Vijay Singh wrote:
> I am investigating an issue where the ixgbe (82599) device is hung and
> I think I have traced it to the driver not getting interrupts. I have
> MSI/X enabled, with 2 rx/tx queues.
>
> I am trying to understand this bit of code in the MSI
> just curious, is this happening under behyve or also native,
> and is it always occurring or it is occasional ?
Native, and it happens when the pps rate is high, even if the
aggregate bandwidth is low.
> I am asking because with netmap when i tried to exploit interrupt
> mitigation (strictly pr
On 01/25/13 17:34, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:14:51PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
On 01/25/13 10:19, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:48:04PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
On 01/24/13 15:50, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39:44PM -0600, Pa
On Monday 28 January 2013 07:35:31 YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 06:09:50PM +0100, Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
> > On Friday 25 January 2013 05:50:48 YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:30:43PM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:21:5
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 01:16:53PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
A> based on your suggestions and submissions I've produced the following patch:
A> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/ng_ether-renaming.diff
A>
A> It's only compile-tested at the moment :)
A> but I'd like to get your opinion about the direc
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
11 matches
Mail list logo