Re: [PATCH] Add a new TCP_IGNOREIDLE socket option

2013-01-23 Thread Sepherosa Ziehau
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:15 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:33:27 am Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:11 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >> > As I mentioned in an earlier thread, I recently had to debug an issue we >> > were >> > seeing across a link with

Re: e1000 serdes link flap

2013-01-23 Thread Ryan Stone
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Neel Natu wrote: > Hi, > > I am running into a problem in head with the e1000 link state > detection logic attached to a 82571EB serdes controller. > > The symptom is that the link state keeps flapping between "up" and "down". > > After I enabled the debug output

Re: kern/173475: [tun] tun(4) stays opened by PID after process is terminated

2013-01-23 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:00:01 am Emanuel Haupt wrote: > The following reply was made to PR kern/173475; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Emanuel Haupt > To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, iz-freebsd0...@hs-karlsruhe.de > Cc: > Subject: Re: kern/173475: [tun] tun(4) stays opened by PID

Re: [PATCH] Add a new TCP_IGNOREIDLE socket option

2013-01-23 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:33:27 am Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:11 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > As I mentioned in an earlier thread, I recently had to debug an issue we > > were > > seeing across a link with a high bandwidth-delay product (both high > > bandwidth > >

Re: Data Center Bridging?

2013-01-23 Thread Eggert, Lars
Hi, On Jan 22, 2013, at 19:23, Jack Vogel wrote: > I have never implemented this in the FreeBSD drivers primarily because the > motivation for it say, in Linux, > was to handle multiple traffic classes, for instance FCOE or iSCSI, but > FreeBSD has not had these features > to implement this for.