The obscure answer has to do with what the L2 adjacency stuff is doing.
Because it adds that default route out a specific interface, it will
send ARP requests out that. Even if the other interface goes down,
it'll still throw them out that interface.
It's just a side effect of how the L2 adjacenc
In message
, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>To use WPA and a static address, you need something like:
>ifconfig_wlan0 ="WPA inet 192.168.1.21/24"
>so that was OK.
Yea, actually I did already have the static+WPA working.
>Now, you seem to have both interfaces on the same /24 with a /24
>netmask. This i
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
> In message
>
> , you wrote:
>
>>for wifi - you need to configure /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf as well,
>>right?
>
> Did that. Yes.
>
>>You don't need the ssid in the ifconfig line;
>
> OK. If you say so. (See my prior e-mail where I
Running:
FreeBSD g1-227.catwhisker.org 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #273
241679M: Thu Oct 18 04:52:24 PDT 2012
r...@g1-227.catwhisker.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
on my laptop, at times when I switch from X to vty0, I see (e.g.):
Oct 18 08:27:07 g1-227 kernel: rn_addmask:
Hi, I'm trying to use CARP on two FreeBSD servers in a ESX environment. But
it's not working.
The problem is that every frame sent from CARP gets back to the same host.
This is an old problem:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-net@freebsd.org/msg30562.html
And already have a patch, but its 3 y
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:20:14PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 13.10.2012 20:22, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:49:21PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> >>Hello list!
> >>
> >>
> >>Packets receiving code for both ixgbe and if_igb looks like the following:
> >>
> >>
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 13.10.2012 20:22, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:49:21PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
>>
>>> Hello list!
>>>
>>>
>>> Packets receiving code for both ixgbe and if_igb looks like the
>>> following:
>>>
>>>
>>> i
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 04:09:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 05.10.2012 01:21, Vijay Singh wrote:
> > Folks, I came up with this while going through the lltable code.
>
> Thank you. I just purged a larger number of stray spl* from the
> net*/* directories. This stuff won't be backported t
On 05.10.2012 01:21, Vijay Singh wrote:
Folks, I came up with this while going through the lltable code.
Thank you. I just purged a larger number of stray spl* from the
net*/* directories. This stuff won't be backported to 9-STABLE
though.
--
Andre
kong@[/u/vijay/bsd/CODE/cur/sys]# svn diff
On 16.10.2012 17:27, h bagade wrote:
Hi all,
I need to add this option to kernel in order to defeating Nmap
OS-Fingerprinting. My system is running as Web Server and also it is the
gateway on the network.
I want to know if setting this option has any side effects on other parts
of the system? I
On 13.10.2012 20:22, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:49:21PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
Hello list!
Packets receiving code for both ixgbe and if_igb looks like the following:
ixgbe_msix_que
-- ixgbe_rxeof()
{
IXGBE_RX_LOCK(rxr);
while
{
11 matches
Mail list logo
