On 10/9/12 5:47 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
I am again on a very remote location with a pretty slow Internet
connection. The problem I would like to solve sounds simple.
What is the easiest way to shape the network traffic so that one
machine gets most of the bandwidth when needed while all
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Denise H. G. wrote:
>
> On 2012/10/09 at 00:44, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Denise H. G. wrote:
>>>
Hi list,
I tried ipw, iwn, and iwi, but ended up with no l
Yes. It says 11g HT/20. That's "11n."
Do "ifconfig wlan0 list sta". See what rate its selecting. It should
be high. I should really replace the MCS rates with actual MCSX rather
than xxxMB, it confuses people.
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailin
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 07:47:40AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am again on a very remote location with a pretty slow Internet
> connection. The problem I would like to solve sounds simple.
>
> What is the easiest way to shape the network traffic so that one
> machine gets most of the
Hi,
I am again on a very remote location with a pretty slow Internet
connection. The problem I would like to solve sounds simple.
What is the easiest way to shape the network traffic so that one
machine gets most of the bandwidth when needed while all other machines
share the remaining bandwidth?
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
> % ifconfig wlan0
> wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
> ether 00:22:fb:76:6d:18
> inet 192.168.1.23 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
> inet6 fe80::222:fbff:fe76:6d18%wlan0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xb
>
Ok so I upgraded t FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE, and now my Intel 5100 is
automagically recognized during boot up.
I have also managed to get it all configured the way I want, and it
is now working just great... well... it is working anyway.
I still do have a couple of questions. Some things about my s
Folks,
FYI. You may find this one interesting. (Yep, I'm aware that at least
Bjoern reads the 6man mailing-list ;-) )
Cheers,
Fernando
Original Message
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01.txt
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:50:49 -0700
From: internet-d
On Oct 8, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Guy Helmer wrote:
> I'm seeing a consistent new kernel panic in FreeBSD 8.3:
>
> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:224
> 224 __asm("movq %%gs:0,%0" : "=r" (td));
> (kgdb) #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:224
> #1 0x804c82e0 in boot (howto=260) at
> ../../../kern/k
Hello,
this is a patch that switches entire IPv4 stack to network
byte order. That means, that at any layer any module should
expect IP header in network byte order. Any host byte order
values can be stored in local variables only and are never stored
into a packet itself.
The new code brin
On 2012/10/09 at 00:44, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Denise H. G. wrote:
>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I tried ipw, iwn, and iwi, but ended up with no luck. What's more, it
>>> seems that the wireless adapter has
On 2012/10/09 at 00:36, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Denise H. G. wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I tried ipw, iwn, and iwi, but ended up with no luck. What's more, it
>> seems that the wireless adapter has not been even detected by the
>> system. I ran 'pciconf -l' and
12 matches
Mail list logo