On 9/28/12 11:02 PM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
On 9/27/2012 9:38 PM, Rudy wrote:
On 09/27/2012 11:00 AM, Rudy wrote:
Rebooting and/or the settings change seems to have stopped the errors.
Here is a pretty little graph showing error rate on em1 for the past 3
days.
http://www.monkeybrains.net/i
Hi,
On man, okt 01, 2012 at 12:24:19pm -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
> In a fairly common setup today, a proxy (say, Varnish) runs on the same
> system as the actual "backend" server (such as Apache).
>
> Would it be worthwhile to alter them both to allow them to talk via a
> socket instead of via T
On Friday, September 28, 2012 8:35:56 am John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:02:59 am Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> > >> John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 6:42:19 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
> > >> w
In a fairly common setup today, a proxy (say, Varnish) runs on the same
system as the actual "backend" server (such as Apache).
Would it be worthwhile to alter them both to allow them to talk via a
socket instead of via TCP (on the lo0 interface)?
Or is the win just too negligible? Thanks!
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
