Hi,
I'm trying to insert vlan tag into the packet using "ether_vlanencap" but
the packet is getting corrupted in the mbuf and m_len is also showing a
wrong length.
Am I doing something wrong here? Can I directly pass mbuf pointer and vlan
tag to this api for inserting the vlan tag?
/Venkat
___
After looking at the code again I think this is just what's happening,
mq_start
will schedule the task when it can't get the lock (due to the interrupt
already
holding it presumeably), so you get the tasklet code in contention with the
interrupt.
Anyone with a clever notion of how to do things bet
Hmmm, this is odd, because the interrupt vector is not being re-enabled
unless
you are not scheduling the task, and when you are the interrupt isn't
enabled til
the end Something funny going on.
You could get contention due to mq_start however, you sure about where its
coming from?
Jack
On
Folks, I've been looking into lock contention on the ixgbe rx & tx locks.
I have collected this data:
debug.lock.prof.stats:
max wait_max total wait_total countavg wait_avg
cnt_hold cnt_lock name
263 304 1329357 858873 322010 4 2
0 45210
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 03:54:41PM +0300, ?zkan KIRIK wrote:
> does igb driver supported by netmap ? if yes, how multiqueue support works?
yes igb is supported, and multiqueue is supported (ipfw-user
just reads from all queues).
Note that igb is a 1Gbit/card peaking at 1.488 Mpps, which is
much sl
does igb driver supported by netmap ? if yes, how multiqueue support works?
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:42:43PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labb? wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> > I just finished a netmap-enabled ve
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:42:43PM +0200, Olivier Cochard-Labb? wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > I just finished a netmap-enabled version of ipfw/dummynet, which
> > runs in userspace and is able to process over 6 million packets per
> > second (Mpps) with simple ru
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I just finished a netmap-enabled version of ipfw/dummynet, which
> runs in userspace and is able to process over 6 million packets per
> second (Mpps) with simple rulesets, and over 2.2 Mpps through
> dummynet pipes (tested on an i7-3400 connec
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
I just finished a netmap-enabled version of ipfw/dummynet, which
runs in userspace and is able to process over 6 million packets per
second (Mpps) with simple rulesets, and over 2.2 Mpps through
dummynet pipes (tested on an i7-3400 connected to VALE ports;
VALE is a software switch part of netmap).
10 matches
Mail list logo
