So I'm trying to set up a tunnel with Hurricane Electric. Works great on
OpenBSD BTW, took only a minute or two.
So heres rc.conf
ipv6_gateway_enable="YES"
gif_interfaces="gif0"
gifconfig_gif0="198.168.0.2 64.62.134.130"
ipv6_network_interfaces="rl0 em0 gif0 lo0"
ifconfig_gif0_ipv6="inet6 2001:4
Howdy,
I just got an off list question about this RFC and haven't had time to dive
into it,
but wondered if anyone had already looked at this in the context of our TCP
stack.
Best,
George
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
Andrew,
Here are the logs with LACP_DEBUG defined in ieee802.3ad_lacp.c,
after typing
Ifconfig lagg0 create
ifconfig lagg0 laggproto lacp laggport ql0 laggport ql1 192.168.100.1 netmask
255.255.255.0
I compiled it as a standalone driver by the way.
System 1:
# ifconfig -v lagg0
lagg0: flags
Andrew,
Thanks for the reply.
The reason for my suspicion on the portflags is thus (extracted from the
ifconfig output in my previous mail):
System 1:
Laggport: ql1 flags = 18 state = 7D
Laggport: ql0 flags = 1c state = 3D
System 2:
Laggport: ql1 flags = 1c state = 7D
Laggport: ql0 flags = 18
Jason,
Thanks for the reply.
Why do you say - " Given this is LAgg and LACP you will see some variation
regardless "
Can you please throw some more light on this?
I understand if there is a slight variation in the throughput when LAGG and
LACP is configured but in my case, I do not see a singl
Hiroki,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:30:02AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
H> Given that we add a new API to
H> enumerate the interfaces including bpf-only providers with fake
H> ifnets, which providers/utilities should be converted to use it? IMO
H> usbusN would be a reasonable target but others
On Jul 9, 2012, at 8:38 PM, Adarsh Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to configure lacp lagg interfaces with 2 systems connected back
> to back as follows:
>
> Ifconfig lagg0 create
> Ifconfig lagg0 laggproto lacp laggport ql0 laggport ql1 192.168.100.1 netmask
> 255.255.255.0
>
> Sometimes,
10.07.2012 15:22, Daniel Hartmeier пишет:
> Are you running any pfil consumers (ipfilter, ipfw, pf), maybe
> unintentionally (with empty ruleset)? If so, can you try disabling them?
No problems with netstat -s, but you were right about pfil -
I direct all incoming traffic to ipfw nat. I passed ip
On 7/10/12 9:10 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:38:24PM -0700, Adarsh Joshi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to configure lacp lagg interfaces with 2 systems connected back
>> to back as follows:
>>
>> Ifconfig lagg0 create
>> Ifconfig lagg0 laggproto lacp laggport q
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 06:13:53PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> tcpdump shows no errors in fragment's checksums.
> Still, they were not reassembled.
I fed your two fragments (with libdnet) to ip_input.c ip_reass() with
debug printfs added, it reassembles them fine, even when in reversed order:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:38:24PM -0700, Adarsh Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to configure lacp lagg interfaces with 2 systems connected back
> to back as follows:
>
> Ifconfig lagg0 create
> Ifconfig lagg0 laggproto lacp laggport ql0 laggport ql1 192.168.100.1 netmask
> 255.255.255.0
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
