Re: kern/146426: [mwl] 802.11n rates not possible on mwl

2012-04-29 Thread adrian
Synopsis: [mwl] 802.11n rates not possible on mwl Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->freebsd-wireless Responsible-Changed-By: adrian Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Apr 30 06:02:49 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Flip to -wireless http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146426 ___

Re: kern/146425: [mwl] mwl dropping all packets during and after high usage on 802.11n

2012-04-29 Thread adrian
Synopsis: [mwl] mwl dropping all packets during and after high usage on 802.11n Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->freebsd-wireless Responsible-Changed-By: adrian Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Apr 30 06:02:18 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Switch over http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-

Re: Full Cone NAT In PF

2012-04-29 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2012-04-29 17:03, Michael MacLeod wrote: I understand that cone NAT is a generally terrible and insecure way to do NAT, but game and application developers seem hell-bent on depending on cone NAT behaviour. Is there a way to make it work with PF? Not directly, no. In most cases where the ap

Re: Full Cone NAT In PF

2012-04-29 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Michael MacLeod wrote: > Every once and a while I run into an issue wherein the symmetric NAT of pf > causes me grief. I've found some older mailing list entries asking about PF > and Cone or Full Cone NAT (such as this one from 2005: > http://www.mail-archive.com

Full Cone NAT In PF

2012-04-29 Thread Michael MacLeod
Hello FreeBSD-Net, Every once and a while I run into an issue wherein the symmetric NAT of pf causes me grief. I've found some older mailing list entries asking about PF and Cone or Full Cone NAT (such as this one from 2005: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-pf@freebsd.org/msg00804.html), but I

Re: Hetzner.de IPv6 and FreeBSD -- default gateway is on other prefix, need to add static route before default -- how?

2012-04-29 Thread Hiroki Sato
Lev Serebryakov wrote in <1606941405.20120429170...@serebryakov.spb.ru>: le> Hello, Freebsd-net. le> le> "Famous" dedicated server provider Hetzner provides native IPv6 for le> servers, but with rather strange routing configuration: you need to le> configure static interface route and make thi

Re: Hetzner.de IPv6 and FreeBSD -- default gateway is on other prefix, need to add static route before default -- how?

2012-04-29 Thread Sascha Holzleiter
On 29.04.2012 15:06, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Freebsd-net. "Famous" dedicated server provider Hetzner provides native IPv6 for servers, but with rather strange routing configuration: you need to configure static interface route and make this route default. If I add such lines in /etc/r

Re: IPv6 MTU discrovery -- how should it work?

2012-04-29 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Seth. You wrote 29 апреля 2012 г., 20:20:54: SM> Make sure you do not block icmp6. Or atleast make sure that SM> unreachable and toobig packets come through even if you do not want echo. icmp6 enabled in firewall. It seems to be problem in "gif" interface, which has this words in BUGS sect

IPv6 tunnel MTU problems: it seems to be gif problem

2012-04-29 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-net. man gif says: If the outer protocol is IPv4, gif does not try to perform path MTU dis- covery for the encapsulated packet (DF bit is set to 0). If the outer protocol is IPv6, path MTU discovery for encapsulated pack- ets may affect communication over the i

Re: IPv6 MTU discrovery -- how should it work?

2012-04-29 Thread Seth Mos
Make sure you do not block icmp6. Or atleast make sure that unreachable and toobig packets come through even if you do not want echo. Cheers, Seth typed on a tiny touchscreen, why exactly? Lev Serebryakov schreef: >Hello, Freebsd-net. > > My home network is connected to IPv6 world with Hurric

Re: Hetzner.de IPv6 and FreeBSD -- default gateway is on other prefix, need to add static route before default -- how?

2012-04-29 Thread Seth Mos
Use the link local addrees of the gateway. That should just work. Cheers, Seth typed on a tiny touchscreen, why exactly? Lev Serebryakov schreef: >Hello, Freebsd-net. > > "Famous" dedicated server provider Hetzner provides native IPv6 for >servers, but with rather strange routing configuration:

Re: Hetzner.de IPv6 and FreeBSD -- default gateway is on other prefix, need to add static route before default -- how?

2012-04-29 Thread Remko Lodder
> Hello, Freebsd-net. > > "Famous" dedicated server provider Hetzner provides native IPv6 for > servers, but with rather strange routing configuration: you need to > configure static interface route and make this route default. > Hi Lev, I have the same "problem". I made an additional static r

Re: IPv6 MTU discrovery -- how should it work?

2012-04-29 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Lev. You wrote 29 апреля 2012 г., 18:47:52: LS>> When I connect to external server twice, and run tcpdump in one LS>> session for another one, and then try to use second (sniffed) session LS>> for bulk transfer, I can clearly see, that server tries to send IPv6 LS>> packets with size 1420

Re: IPv6 MTU discrovery -- how should it work?

2012-04-29 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Lev. You wrote 29 апреля 2012 г., 18:35:59: LS> When I connect to external server twice, and run tcpdump in one LS> session for another one, and then try to use second (sniffed) session LS> for bulk transfer, I can clearly see, that server tries to send IPv6 LS> packets with size 1420 to

IPv6 MTU discrovery -- how should it work?

2012-04-29 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-net. My home network is connected to IPv6 world with Hurricane Electric's tunnel (IPv6 over IPv6, "gif"). It has MTU 1280. Everything works till packets are small -- for example, interactive shell (ssh) session over IPv6 works great. But when I need to transfer buil of bytes

Hetzner.de IPv6 and FreeBSD -- default gateway is on other prefix, need to add static route before default -- how?

2012-04-29 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-net. "Famous" dedicated server provider Hetzner provides native IPv6 for servers, but with rather strange routing configuration: you need to configure static interface route and make this route default. If I add such lines in /etc/rc.conf: ifconfig_re0_ipv6="inet6 2a01:4f8:131:6