The following reply was made to PR kern/166940; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrey Zonov
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, vam...@mail.ru
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/166940: [ipfilter] [panic] Double fault in kern 8.2
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:05:40 +0400
Hi,
Try my patch from this PR [1].
Old Synopsis: Double fault in kern 8.2
New Synopsis: [ipfilter] [panic] Double fault in kern 8.2
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Apr 23 03:12:58 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
reclassify.
http://www.freebsd.o
Synopsis: [alc] NIC alc(4) does not support 1000baseTX
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 23 01:39:37 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
Show me the output of "pciconf -lcbv" and dmesg output.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->yongari
Re
Synopsis: [rl] Realtek RTL8100 keeps droping link
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 23 01:34:58 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
Try set the following loader tunable in /boot/loader.conf and let
me know whether that change makes any difference.
Synopsis: [msk] msk driver keeps erroring
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 23 01:29:53 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
Would you try the diff at the following URL?
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/sys/dev/msk/if_msk.c?r1=229524&r2=2298
Synopsis: [re] if_re watchdog timeout
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: yongari
State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 23 01:25:58 UTC 2012
State-Changed-Why:
Would you show me the output of "ifconfig re0"?
Just sending large files from your box through re0 is enough to
reproduce the i
* Lars Wilke wrote:
> * Jack Vogel wrote:
> > ok then i guess i will upgrade to 8.3-R, is the driver there reasonably
> > new?
> >
> > Yes, that should be fine.
Ok, with 8.3R everything seems to be stable, at least i could not
reproduce the NIC resetting itself in last 4 houers now :)
But i no
Most of these issues are well known. Addressing the bottlenecks is
simply time consuming due to the fact that any bugs introduced during
development potentially impact many users.
-Kip
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This honestly sounds like it's begging for an
> i
Old Synopsis: Sending multiple IGMP packets crashes kernel
New Synopsis: [igmp]: Sending multiple IGMP packets crashes kernel
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Apr 22 13:42:43 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reasis
