Re: getifaddrs & ipv6 scope

2012-04-13 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:01:39 +1200 > Andrew Thompson said: thompsa> On 13 April 2012 18:41, Rainer Bredehorn wrote: > Hi! > >> I have noticed that getifaddrs() does not have sin6_scope_id set to >> the interface id for link local addresses on AF_INET6 types. Running >> the followi

Re: kern/166909: [alc] NIC alc(4) does not support 1000baseTX

2012-04-13 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: NIC alc (4) does not support 1000baseTX New Synopsis: [alc] NIC alc(4) does not support 1000baseTX Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Apr 13 16:45:55 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintaine

Re: 82574L hangs (with r233708 e1000 driver).

2012-04-13 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:40:27PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Konstantin Belousov > wrote: > > And, on receive, the atom board does receive interrupts, em0:rx 0 counter > > in vmstat -i increases. Even more fun, the sysctl dev.em.0.debug > > shows increasing hw rdh

Re: getifaddrs & ipv6 scope

2012-04-13 Thread Andrew Thompson
On 13 April 2012 18:41, Rainer Bredehorn wrote: > Hi! > >> I have noticed that getifaddrs() does not have sin6_scope_id set to >> the interface id for link local addresses on AF_INET6 types. Running >> the following program gives different results on Linux > > ifconfig shows the scopeid according