Replying to my own message again, I tried booting the same
configuration on the raw computer hardware (as opposed to vmware). On
the raw computer hardware, pxeboot correctly loads a kernel and boots
it. This seems to imply that pxeboot and vmware 8.x don't play well
together.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012
On 2012-Apr-05 13:22:37 -0700, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 12:39:46PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2012-Apr-05 07:17:49 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> >/etc/devd.conf includes a rule to start dhclient when an Ethernet or
>> >802.11 interface reports "link up", with a comment
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 12:39:46PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Apr-05 07:17:49 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >/etc/devd.conf includes a rule to start dhclient when an Ethernet or
> >802.11 interface reports "link up", with a comment: "No link down rule
> >exists because dhclient automatica
On 2012-Apr-05 07:17:49 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>/etc/devd.conf includes a rule to start dhclient when an Ethernet or
>802.11 interface reports "link up", with a comment: "No link down rule
>exists because dhclient automatically exits when the link goes down."
>IMHO, this is the desired behavio
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:51:19AM -0400, enoch wrote:
> YongHyeon PYUN writes:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:37:15AM -0400, enoch wrote:
> >> YongHyeon PYUN writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:45:30AM -0400, enoch wrote:
> >> >> YongHyeon PYUN writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Mon,
/etc/devd.conf includes a rule to start dhclient when an Ethernet or
802.11 interface reports "link up", with a comment: "No link down rule
exists because dhclient automatically exits when the link goes down."
IMHO, this is the desired behaviour, unfortunately it's not the way
dhclient actually beh
On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:24:49 am Julian Elischer wrote:
> I made a sub-page for the working group at:
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/201205DevSummit/Networking
>
> (directly ripped off the virtualization sub-page)
>
> feel free to add ideas etc. there. (or 'register' if you are coming to
>
YongHyeon PYUN writes:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:37:15AM -0400, enoch wrote:
>> YongHyeon PYUN writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:45:30AM -0400, enoch wrote:
>> >> YongHyeon PYUN writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote:
>> >> >> YongHyeon PYUN w
>
>
> Almost as bad as back when I sent a note to a customer about a
> requirement to adjust our 'peeing' policy. (And the spell checker
> won't catch that one.)
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Beeblebrox wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 3,
On 04.04.2012 17:03, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
The other side is retransmitting data we have already received
and acknowledged ... That behavior is totally non-compliant.
Any chance our ack of that data got dropped/lost enroute, and the
other side is resending after
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> The other side is retransmitting data we have already received
> and acknowledged ... That behavior is totally non-compliant.
Any chance our ack of that data got dropped/lost enroute, and the
other side is resending after timing out?
_
11 matches
Mail list logo