Re: Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet and Microcode

2012-03-26 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:37:45PM +0200, Andreas Longwitz wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > > > I've attached a patch which will show both compatibility and EEPROM > > ID word and allowed loading microcode for 82550 family. Let me > > know whether this patch works for you. > > Yes, the patch w

Re: The problem with MTU <1500

2012-03-26 Thread Andrey Zonov
On 27.03.2012 0:06, Andrey Zonov wrote: On 26.03.2012 17:43, Владислав Продан wrote: Dear all! I have two different values of uplink MTU - 1440 and 1492. And in a local network - 1500. In Cisco routers can be set 'set ip df 0', but I have no such router :( What options are there for FreeBSD?

Re: The problem with MTU <1500

2012-03-26 Thread Andrey Zonov
On 26.03.2012 17:43, Владислав Продан wrote: Dear all! I have two different values of uplink MTU - 1440 and 1492. And in a local network - 1500. In Cisco routers can be set 'set ip df 0', but I have no such router :( What options are there for FreeBSD? sysctl net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=0

Re: The problem with MTU <1500

2012-03-26 Thread Вадим Уразаев
You may use this patch to ipfw http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=103454 Or you may use ng_patch netgraph node (man ng_patch(4) should give you some examples) The simpliest way to do what you want is pf rule scrub in on em0 no-df performance of all those methods you should check by youre

Re: 9-STABLE + Infiniband - incorrect interface counters

2012-03-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, March 24, 2012 7:52:08 am Alex Tutubalin wrote: > Hi, > > I'm playing with two FreeBSD 9-STABLE boxes connected via 10Gbps > Infiniband (more details below) in Infiniband connected mode. > > I see incorrect interface statistics (e.g. in netstat output), output > counters are 2x mor

Re: Intel 82550 Pro/100 Ethernet and Microcode

2012-03-26 Thread Andreas Longwitz
YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > > I've attached a patch which will show both compatibility and EEPROM > ID word and allowed loading microcode for 82550 family. Let me > know whether this patch works for you. Yes, the patch workes fine and I have for my LOM's (rev 0x0d): fxp0: port fxp0: Compatibi

Re: The problem with MTU <1500

2012-03-26 Thread Michael Sierchio
2012/3/26 Владислав Продан > > Dear all! > I have two different values of uplink MTU - 1440 and 1492. > And in a local network - 1500. > In Cisco routers can be set 'set ip df 0', but I have no such router :( > What options are there for FreeBSD? > man ifconfig - not the 'mtu' option. You shou

The problem with MTU <1500

2012-03-26 Thread Владислав Продан
Dear all! I have two different values of uplink MTU - 1440 and 1492. And in a local network - 1500. In Cisco routers can be set 'set ip df 0', but I have no such router :( What options are there for FreeBSD? Only use the net/tcpmssd? Will it be possible to process both two channels of 1Gb? -- V

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org

2012-03-26 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker

[PATCH] BPF locking redesign

2012-03-26 Thread Alexander V. Chernikov
Hello list! There are some patches that can significantly improve forwarding performance if BPF consumers are present. However, some changes are a bit hackish and ABI change is required. Those are split into separate patches I want to discuss. You probably need to merge r233505 for patches t