Thanks Chuck for getting back. I have a question inlined:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:18 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
> >> What difference does it make when I have each (separately) in my
> rc.conf:
> >>
> >> 1) no network_interfaces at all
> >>
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:27 PM, nyoman.b...@gmail.com
wrote:
> dear guru,
>
> every time I open my firewall to allow SSH connection from Internet
> after few days my firewall always stuck. Stuck in here meaning
> that it deny all request (deny any from any).
> And after I "ipfw disable firewall"
On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:18 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
>> What difference does it make when I have each (separately) in my rc.conf:
>>
>> 1) no network_interfaces at all
>> 2) network_interfaces="AUTO"
These two are the same.
>> 3) network_interfaces="em0"
This will configure em0 only, using ifc
Can someone please help? :-)
On Mar 12, 2012 9:04 AM, "hiren panchasara"
wrote:
> Looking at man rc.conf,
>
> network_interfaces
> (str) Set to the list of network interfaces to configure
> on
> this host or “AUTO” (the default) for all current
> interfaces.
On 3/13/12 1:45 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote:
On 14 March 2012 09:40, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/11/12 1:06 AM, h bagade wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to add STP and RSTP protocols to bridge node on
netgraph? Should I implement it on the node or it has done before?
___
On 14 March 2012 09:40, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 3/11/12 1:06 AM, h bagade wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is there any way to add STP and RSTP protocols to bridge node on
>> netgraph? Should I implement it on the node or it has done before?
>> ___
>> free
On 3/11/12 1:06 AM, h bagade wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to add STP and RSTP protocols to bridge node on
netgraph? Should I implement it on the node or it has done before?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
saeedeh motlagh writes:
| i think i have similar problem too. you want to have tagged and
| untagged traffic at the same time on the trunk port, right?
| in your topology the vlans and trunk port are bridged and the tagged
| traffic is passed through the trunk port and every thing works fine.
| the
Same behaviour with just one queue:-
Packets Pings
Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1. ixtest 0.0%280.1 24.4 0.1 297.5 73.0
ix0: port
0x2000-0x201f mem 0xd840-0xd847,0xd848-0xd8483fff irq 52 at device
i think i have similar problem too. you want to have tagged and
untagged traffic at the same time on the trunk port, right?
in your topology the vlans and trunk port are bridged and the tagged
traffic is passed through the trunk port and every thing works fine.
then when you want to have the untag
10 matches
Mail list logo