Re: Abstracting struct ifnet

2012-02-16 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, I honestly quite like this idea. Adrian On 16 February 2012 20:16, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > All, > > Juniper is in the final phases of creating a clean separation > between FreeBSD and Junos, so as to make upgrades of FreeBSD > easier. This also allows Juniper to track -current and be mo

Re: kern/165174: [patch] [tap] allow tap(4) to keep its address on close

2012-02-16 Thread linimon
Synopsis: [patch] [tap] allow tap(4) to keep its address on close Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 17 06:53:28 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?

Re: Question on TSO/LSO Transmit Frames

2012-02-16 Thread YongHyeon PYUN
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:03:54AM -0800, David Somayajulu wrote: > Hi All, > Is it safe to assume that when a driver receives an Ethernet frame to > transmit with CSUM_TSO bit set in > > m_head->m_pkthdr.csum_flags ; where m_head is the first (struct mbuf) in the > mbuf chain > > that the [E

Re: kern/165032: [mii] [patch] brgphy(4) is not used for BCM57780

2012-02-16 Thread linimon
Old Synopsis: brgphy(4) is not used for BCM57780 New Synopsis: [mii] [patch] brgphy(4) is not used for BCM57780 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 17 04:38:52 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintaine

Abstracting struct ifnet

2012-02-16 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
All, Juniper is in the final phases of creating a clean separation between FreeBSD and Junos, so as to make upgrades of FreeBSD easier. This also allows Juniper to track -current and be more active FreeBSD contributors. To that end, we have a short-term and hopefully short-lived problem to solve,

Re: kern/164901: [regression] [patch] [lagg] igb/lagg poor traffic distribution

2012-02-16 Thread linimon
Synopsis: [regression] [patch] [lagg] igb/lagg poor traffic distribution Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 17 04:26:12 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer(s). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-

rsh -n to cisco router: incomplete output

2012-02-16 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
Dear colleagues, some time ago users of our looking glass start to complain about non-working ping and traceroute commands; looking at the source, I've found that rsh -n router command partially stops working: it returns some of contents (results up to first ping or up to first answer from th

Question on TSO/LSO Transmit Frames

2012-02-16 Thread David Somayajulu
Hi All, Is it safe to assume that when a driver receives an Ethernet frame to transmit with CSUM_TSO bit set in m_head->m_pkthdr.csum_flags ; where m_head is the first (struct mbuf) in the mbuf chain that the [Ethernet Header] + [VLAN Tag if present] + [IP Header] + [TCP Header] are all pres

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

2012-02-16 Thread Arno J. Klaassen
[ .. stuff deleted (WEP-128 problem) ] >one more thing came to my mind: > >you don't need to use wpa_supplicant to get WEP support. AFAIK WEP128 >is different name for 104-bits key and that might be supported without >need of wpa_supplicant. man ifconfig might shed some light. I

Re: Assigning multiple IPs in the same network to an interface

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew Boyer
On Feb 16, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Rainer Bredehorn wrote: >> i have a problem with setting multiple IPs in the same network in FreeBSD: >> >> - suppose I assign two new IP addresses in the same network to eth0 with >> ifconfig: >> #ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.10.1/24 >> #ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.10.2

Re: Assigning multiple IPs in the same network to an interface

2012-02-16 Thread Rainer Bredehorn
> i have a problem with setting multiple IPs in the same network in FreeBSD: > > - suppose I assign two new IP addresses in the same network to eth0 with > ifconfig: > #ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.10.1/24 > #ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.10.2/24 > Second address should be an alias address. ;-) _

Re: Assigning multiple IPs in the same network to an interface

2012-02-16 Thread Andrew Boyer
On Feb 16, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 2/16/12 8:08 AM, M. V. wrote: >> hi everybody, >> >> i have a problem with setting multiple IPs in the same network in FreeBSD: >> >> - suppose I assign two new IP addresses in the same network to eth0 with >> ifconfig: >> #ifconfig eth0

Re: Assigning multiple IPs in the same network to an interface

2012-02-16 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 2/16/12 8:08 AM, M. V. wrote: > hi everybody, > > i have a problem with setting multiple IPs in the same network in FreeBSD: > > - suppose I assign two new IP addresses in the same network to eth0 with > ifconfig: > #ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.10.1/24 > #ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.10.2/24 >

Re: Help : configuring wpa_suplpicant.conf for WEP + login/passwd

2012-02-16 Thread Yuri Kurenkov
On 14.02.2012 17:51, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: Hello, could someone provide me wit a hint how to get wpa_supplicant to work in the following environment : - standard : IEEE 802.11 (at least they pretend in the doc) -mode : "infrastructure" (?) -WEP: 128bit - Authent : ope

Assigning multiple IPs in the same network to an interface

2012-02-16 Thread M. V.
hi everybody, i have a problem with setting multiple IPs in the same network in FreeBSD: - suppose I assign two new IP addresses in the same network to eth0 with ifconfig: #ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.10.1/24 #ifconfig eth0 add 192.168.10.2/24 - everything works fine and the output of "netstat -r