On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Nikolay Denev wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 4:41 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >> Hi--
> >>
> >> On Jan 26, 2012, at 9:24 AM, satish amara wrote:
> >>> I have question regarding the size of the state table kept i
On 01/24/2012 11:27 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm suffering from low network performance on one of my FreeBSDs.
> I have an i386 8.2-RELEASE machine with an fxp(4) adapter. It's
> connected though a bunch of catalysts 2950 to another 8.2. While other
> machines in this server room us
Old Synopsis: net.bpf.zerocopy_enable=1 makes pflogd eat cpu and hang
New Synopsis: [bpf] net.bpf.zerocopy_enable=1 makes pflogd eat cpu and hang
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Jan 28 04:58:28 UTC 2012
Responsibl
Hello Kip,
I had looked flowtable code briefly and still not sure whether I
understand it correctly. At this moment I have a question.
Is it possible to apply flowtable techniques for forwarding packets? If
I understand it right it looks it's impossible at current status because
flowtable is on
Yuri Pankov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote:
> > I'm trying to setup a kerberized NFS system made of a server and a
> > client (both freebsd 9 amd64 stable)
> >
> > I've tried to follow this howto:
> > http://code.google.com/p/macnfsv4/wiki/FreeBSD8KerberizedNF
Yuri Pankov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote:
> > I'm trying to setup a kerberized NFS system made of a server and a
> > client (both freebsd 9 amd64 stable)
> >
> > I've tried to follow this howto:
> > http://code.google.com/p/macnfsv4/wiki/FreeBSD8KerberizedNF
Giulio Ferro wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a kerberized NFS system made of a server and a
> client (both freebsd 9 amd64 stable)
>
> I've tried to follow this howto:
> http://code.google.com/p/macnfsv4/wiki/FreeBSD8KerberizedNFSSetup
>
> But couldn't get much out of it.
>
> First question : is th
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:58:47PM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a kerberized NFS system made of a server and a
> client (both freebsd 9 amd64 stable)
>
> I've tried to follow this howto:
> http://code.google.com/p/macnfsv4/wiki/FreeBSD8KerberizedNFSSetup
>
> But couldn't get m
I'm trying to setup a kerberized NFS system made of a server and a
client (both freebsd 9 amd64 stable)
I've tried to follow this howto:
http://code.google.com/p/macnfsv4/wiki/FreeBSD8KerberizedNFSSetup
But couldn't get much out of it.
First question : is this howto still valid or something mor
This has been completed and is part of net-snmp-5.7.1_4.
-r
On (01/27/12 17:50), Alexey Kouznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> There are bug in net-snmp. net-snmp die (coredump) on SIGHUP while we have
> disk command defined in snmpd.*conf. Bellow fix in main net-snmp tree. I
> think it is good idea t
The following reply was made to PR kern/159621; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Pavel Polyakov"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, b...@kobyla.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/159621: [tcp] [panic] panic: soabort: so_count
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:44:28 +0200
Dump header from device /dev/ada1p20
The following reply was made to PR kern/159621; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Pavel Polyakov"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, b...@kobyla.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/159621: [tcp] [panic] panic: soabort: so_count
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:48:10 +0200
Dump header from device /dev/ada1p20
Hello!
There are bug in net-snmp. net-snmp die (coredump) on SIGHUP while we have
disk command defined in snmpd.*conf. Bellow fix in main net-snmp tree. I
think it is good idea to add such small patch to the FreeBSD port unlil
they release new version an new version will be included to the ports.
13 matches
Mail list logo
