Hi
I have a small system running FreeBSD 8.2 that does NAT using ipfw and
natd to systems attached to two interfaces: em0 and wlan0. I have a
dhcpd daemon issuing leases on those interfaces. The system has an em1
interface plugged into a cable modem where it obtains a DHCP lease from
an ISP
ok, i
o used device.hints to disable both bge interfaces
o booted successfully
o used serial console
o ifconfiged bge0 to the normal addresses
o and it is working
i suspect that something sucks in bge initialization at startup.
insightful, i know. sorry.
randy
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Kim Culhan wrote:
> Running 10-curent from 01-20-12
> the msk0 interface hung, on the console:
>
> msk0: watchdog timeout
> msk0: prefetch unit stuck?
> msk0: initialization failed: no memory for Rx buffers
>
> Verbose boot dmesg output attached.
>
known issue
way cool. a /boot/device.hints entry of
hint.acpi.bge.1.disable=1
did disable bge1. but now it's bge0, and i need that interface. and
media are present!
so i tried /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig_bge0="198.180.150.1/25 media 1000baseTX"
ifconfig_bge0_ipv6="inet6 2001:418:8006::1/64"
ifco
Old Synopsis: gre misses RUNNING flag after a reboot
New Synopsis: [gre] gre misses RUNNING flag after a reboot
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 26 02:23:58 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer
Old Synopsis: connect double head igb to switch cause system to halt
New Synopsis: [igb] connect double head igb to switch cause system to halt
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 26 02:23:09 UTC 2012
Responsible-
day old i386 current
bge1: mem
0xd020-0xd020 irq 10 at device 0.0 on pci5
bge1: CHIP ID 0x4101; ASIC REV 0x04; CHIP REV 0x41; PCI-E
miibus1: on bge1
brgphy1: PHY 1 on miibus1
brgphy1: OUI 0x001018, model 0x0018, rev. 0
brgphy1: no media present
ifmedia_set: no match for 0x0/0x
Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm suffering from low network performance on one of my FreeBSDs.
> I have an i386 8.2-RELEASE machine with an fxp(4) adapter. It's
> connected though a bunch of catalysts 2950 to another 8.2. While other
> machines in this server room using the same sequence of
I have problem with nat traversal. The server is directly connected to
the Internet, the client is behind a gateway that use nat.
The problem is that the server tries to respond to the clients internal
private address 192.168.1.10, (and the ISP sends icmp messages back to
the server, telling i
I have problem with nat traversal. The server is directly connected to
the Internet, the client is behind a gateway that use nat.
The problem is that the server tries to respond to the clients internal
private address 192.168.1.10, (and the ISP sends icmp messages back to
the server, telling i
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:58:08AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 14.12.2011 um 02:16 schrieb Marius Strobl:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53:48AM -0800, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:04:51AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >>> Am 13.12.2011 um 03:50 schrieb YongHyeon PY
Old Synopsis: Incorrect IP checksum on pfil pass from ip_output()
New Synopsis: [pfil] Incorrect IP checksum on pfil pass from ip_output()
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 25 19:58:14 UTC 2012
Responsible-Chang
On 25/01/2012 06:27, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hi.
I'm suffering from low network performance on one of my FreeBSDs.
I have an i386 8.2-RELEASE machine with an fxp(4) adapter. It's
connected though a bunch of catalysts 2950 to another 8.2.
Another thing to try would be to upgrade both ends to
Hello.
I have test boxes with em(4) network card - Intel 82563EB
FreeBSD version - 8.2 stable from 2012-01-15, amd64
When this NIC is full loaded livelock occurs - system is unresponsive
even from local console.
To generate load I use netsend from /usr/src/tools/tools/netrate/
but other traffic
Am 25.01.2012 um 08:12 schrieb Adrian Chadd:
> So when will you two have something consensus-y to commit? :-)
>
> What I'm hoping for is:
>
> * some traction on the MII bus / MDIO bus split and tidyup from stb, which is
> nice;
> * ray's switch API for speaking to userland with;
> * agreeing on
15 matches
Mail list logo