On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding
> > a field for the FIB isn't as trivial as I thought because
> > ps only sees struct kinfo_proc (via sys
Здравствуйте, Lev.
Вы писали 12 января 2012 г., 13:07:15:
LS> Hello, Lev.
LS> You wrote 12 января 2012 г., 15:00:20:
>>> But what mav says makes sense.
>> It is it -- stack size. Setting KSTACK_PAGES=6 fixes situation.
LS> OOOPS. Not. After another 5 minutes ng_queue again consumes 100% CPU
L
.. this is why someone needs to put together an automated testing
framework to build, run, test and report on this.
Then, the warehouse-sized space and cooling needed for a few hundred
machines, all doing automated regression testing.
That's how "a project" fixes this. :-) The alternative is peop
Hello,
A web server that I administer running Nginx and FreeBSD-7.3-STABLE was recently
under a ICMP attack that generated a large amount of outgoing TCP traffic.
With some tcpdump and netflow analysis it was evident that the attachers are
using
ICMP host-unreach need-frag messages to make the we
Hello, networkers!
I'd like to remove from kernel support for several really outdated
ioctls:
SIOCSIFADDR
SIOCSIFNETMASK
SIOCSIFBRDADDR
SIOCSIFDSTADDR
Actually their support was always only declared, you can trigger panics
easily if you play with them.
These ioctls were outdated eve
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding
> > a field for the FIB isn't as trivial as I thought because
> > ps only sees struct kinfo_proc (via sysctl kern.proc.*)
> > which doesn't contain the FIB.
On Oct 25, 2011, at 8:17 PM, Sean Mahood wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that when doing a netstat -s (running on a kernel without SCTP
> support compiled in), I get the following message output to stderr:
>
> netstat: sysctl: net.inet.sctp.stats: No such file or directory
>
> Wondering why it w
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 12 января 2012 г., 15:00:20:
>> But what mav says makes sense.
> It is it -- stack size. Setting KSTACK_PAGES=6 fixes situation.
OOOPS. Not. After another 5 minutes ng_queue again consumes 100% CPU
:(
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
___
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 12 января 2012 г., 14:29:57:
> But what mav says makes sense.
It is it -- stack size. Setting KSTACK_PAGES=6 fixes situation.
Feature request: warn user when ng_queue is used due to stack
limitations :) I know from mav, that sometime it is unavoidable (with
protocols
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 12 января 2012 г., 14:29:57:
> Well, I mostly meant things like uptime, load level and pattern, etc.
These are identical too -- freshly boot system, same load (torrent
client on other box), only load -- traffic, as it is router, same
upload/download speeds and peer cou
on 12/01/2012 12:05 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
> Hello, Andriy.
> You wrote 12 января 2012 г., 13:54:41:
>
>>> Switching to 4BSD helps. 4BSD works as usual: all CPU time is
>>> interrupts and network thread, system is responsive under heaviest load,
>>> normal operations of DNS, DHCP a
Hi.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:14:24PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Alex Dupre wrote:
> >
> > I've setup my first IPSEC VPN beetween FreeBSD 8.2 and CheckPoint
> > VPN-1. I've used a gif interface for the tunnel, setkey for security
> > policies and racoon for ikev1.
>
> I've peered with Check
on 12/01/2012 11:31 Lev Serebryakov said the following:
> Switching to 4BSD helps. 4BSD works as usual: all CPU time is
> interrupts and network thread, system is responsive under heaviest load,
> normal operations of DNS, DHCP and hostapd.
How reproducible is this result?
In other words, have
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 12 января 2012 г., 13:54:41:
>> Switching to 4BSD helps. 4BSD works as usual: all CPU time is
>> interrupts and network thread, system is responsive under heaviest load,
>> normal operations of DNS, DHCP and hostapd.
> How reproducible is this result?
100%
> In other
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I have router, which connects to upstream ISP with mpd5 from ports
using PPPoE.
I've used SCHED_ULE for long time without nay problems. Under heavy
network load (router is not the fastest one -- 500Mhz Geode CPU) main
consumer of CPU was "intr{swi1: netisr 0}" threa
Bjoern A. Zeeb ha scritto:
If you are using tunnel mode and gif you'll have trouble; just use tunnel mode
without gif and you'll be happy.
Done, it works and I see all packets on enc0 now, thanks.
It's because (our) pf cannot NAT on incoming but only on outgoing interfaces.
And you need
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 12 января 2012 г., 0:33:32:
> I'll try to find revision, which breaks ULE + NetGraph by binary
> search, but it takes some time as here is 590 revisions in "head/sys"
> between previous version I used (which works Ok with ULE) and current
> version (which doesn't). So, it sh
17 matches
Mail list logo
