Yes, it is.
on "freebsd 0 aka switch":
ifconfig bridge0 create
ifconfig em0.10 create #em0 port is patched to the "real" switch to a
trunk port configured to accept at least vlan 10
ifconfig em1 #this port is patched to "freebsd 1"
ifconfig em2 #this port is patched to "freebsd 2"
ifconfig brid
Old Synopsis: interface does not count bytes on interface
New Synopsis: [vlan]: interface does not count bytes on interface
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: remko
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Dec 21 06:52:20 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
This is
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 22:38, saeedeh motlagh
wrote:
> thankyou every body for your attention. yes bridging is done without ip
> address. i try to use all the point which is mentioned here but my problem
> is not solved yet.
> you know i have three freebsd box. i wanna to config the intermediate
I was fighting with UDP issues before the latest checkin, so you should
look at THAT version, 2.3.1 in HEAD please.
Jack
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Clint wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:48:14 -0800, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>
>> I also see similar excessive system load with em(4) on latest
thankyou every body for your attention. yes bridging is done without ip
address. i try to use all the point which is mentioned here but my problem
is not solved yet.
you know i have three freebsd box. i wanna to config the intermediate one
as switch and two others as vlan member. i want to have jus
Hi,
I'm looking to upgrade a frame relay connection, currently implemented in a
Soekris box with a Sangoma A101 card, running 5.x and Sangoma's Wanpipe.
Sangoma seem to have ditched FreeBSD support for Wanpipe, and I can't see a
driver in FreeBSD 9.
I'm looking at using ng_frame_relay. Does an
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:48:14 -0800, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
I also see similar excessive system load with em(4) on latest HEAD.
Self-clocking protocols like TCP does not seem to suffer from the
issue but UDP clearly shows the issue. A single bulk UDP transmit
test session completely halts the box
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:54:03PM -0700, Clint wrote:
> I'm experiencing a performance/load issue when using an Intel 82580
> quad port NIC when trying to stream video files via NFS/UDP. The media
> streamers are only 100Mbit, but they can bring the server to its knees
> when trying to stream a
I'm experiencing a performance/load issue when using an Intel 82580
quad port NIC when trying to stream video files via NFS/UDP. The media
streamers are only 100Mbit, but they can bring the server to its knees
when trying to stream a single 90Mbit/s file that meant to test the
performance of th
I have had another report of this problem, I am nominally on vacation for a
couple of weeks, but have promised to look at the issue after the holidays.
Regards,
Jack
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Corey Smith wrote:
> This is an old thread from 2010 but I am running into the same issue
> wh
This is an old thread from 2010 but I am running into the same issue
while using an Intel 2 x 10Gbps 82599 card.
Using other 10Gbps Intel cards based on other chipsets I have been
able to setup a monitor bridge to aggregate all traffic into a single
feed. When setting up a bridge in monitor mode
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 03:58:30PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> Pawel Tyll wrote:
> > Hi lists,
> >
> > Are there any plans to implement IPv6 tables in ipfw? It would seem
> > that our gov. may want to force us into IPv6 in 6 months ;)
> I've got working implementation for IPv4+IPv6 an
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 6:21:27 pm Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:00:23AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > An update. I've sent Pawel a testing patch to see if my hypothesis is
> > correct
> > (www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/tcp_negwin_test.patch). If it is then I
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
