Re: if_xl on 8.2

2011-11-23 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 11/23/11 19:05, Brian Seklecki (Mobile) wrote: Send us: grep ifconfig /etc/rc.conf ifconfig -a ifconfig -m netstat -i netstat -rn netstat -i arp -an For both the working and non-working cards to compare. Sorry for the noise... I accidentally removed the "media" option from rc.conf and the

Re: if_xl on 8.2

2011-11-23 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 11/23/11 19:05, Brian Seklecki (Mobile) wrote: Send us: grep ifconfig /etc/rc.conf ifconfig -a ifconfig -m netstat -i netstat -rn netstat -i arp -an ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ne

Re: if_xl on 8.2

2011-11-23 Thread Brian Seklecki (Mobile)
Send us: grep ifconfig /etc/rc.conf ifconfig -a ifconfig -m netstat -i netstat -rn netstat -i arp -an For both the working and non-working cards to compare. Thx, ~BAS On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello. Just to say today I upgraded from 8.1 to 8.2 and xl0 stopped wo

Re: arprequest triggered panic

2011-11-23 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 11/23/2011 3:53 PM, Marko Zec wrote: On Wednesday 23 November 2011 14:17:11 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: On 11/23/2011 1:22 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: I'd suspect VIMAGE. Can you please try w/o it and if it appears to be VIMAGE-related, then please file a PR. It seems VIMAGE related. I'll ask at

if_xl on 8.2

2011-11-23 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. Just to say today I upgraded from 8.1 to 8.2 and xl0 stopped working. It is detected: xl0: <3Com 3c900B-COMBO Etherlink XL> port 0xd800-0xd87f mem 0xfdefe000-0xfdefe07f irq 17 at device 7.0 on pci1 xl0: selecting 10baseT transceiver, half duplex xl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:04:22:a9:c0 x

Re: arprequest triggered panic

2011-11-23 Thread Marko Zec
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 14:17:11 Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On 11/23/2011 1:22 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > I'd suspect VIMAGE. Can you please try w/o it and if it appears to be > > VIMAGE-related, then please file a PR. > > It seems VIMAGE related. I'll ask at virtualization@. From the back

Re: arprequest triggered panic

2011-11-23 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 11/23/2011 1:22 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: I'd suspect VIMAGE. Can you please try w/o it and if it appears to be VIMAGE-related, then please file a PR. It seems VIMAGE related. I'll ask at virtualization@. Thanks, Nikos ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org

Re: Openbgpd incorrectly sets TCP_MD5 on the listen socket, regardless of configuration

2011-11-23 Thread Borja Marcos
On Nov 23, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Nikolay Denev wrote: > I'm seeing exactly the same problem with Quagga. > Quagga's bgpd also seem to always set the TCP_MD5 socket option, and newer > freebsd 8.2 machines > don't seem to be able to establish bgp sessions, probably due to the recent > TCP_MD5 fixes

Re: Openbgpd incorrectly sets TCP_MD5 on the listen socket, regardless of configuration

2011-11-23 Thread Nikolay Denev
On Nov 21, 2011, at 3:29 PM, Borja Marcos wrote: > > (Sent to freebsd-bugs as well, copied here for discussion, if needed) > > > > > > Sorry for the brief report and the scarce details. The fing form insists > on rejecting the captcha after one hour writing a report. > > So, in

Re: arprequest triggered panic

2011-11-23 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 01:09:34PM +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: N> On 11/22/2011 9:48 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: N> > Can't reproduce this on head. May be some additional measures are needed? Traffic? N> N> Just noticed that the panic does not happen using GENERIC. N> Here is my kernel configura

Re: arprequest triggered panic

2011-11-23 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 11/22/2011 9:48 PM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Can't reproduce this on head. May be some additional measures are needed? Traffic? Just noticed that the panic does not happen using GENERIC. Here is my kernel configuration, if you want to dig deeper. include GENERIC ident LAB options VIMA

Re: Openbgpd incorrectly sets TCP_MD5 on the listen socket, regardless of configuration

2011-11-23 Thread Borja Marcos
On Nov 23, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Nikolay Denev wrote: > the RFC states : > > Upon receiving a signed segment, the receiver must validate it by > calculating its own digest from the same data (using its own key) and > comparing the two digest. A failing comparison must result in the > segmen